Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing

0
731

Abstract

The emergence of the novel SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019 has triggered an ongoing global pandemic of severe pneumonia-like disease designated as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)1. The development of a vaccine is likely to require at least 12-18 months, and the typical timeline for approval of a novel antiviral therapeutic can exceed 10 years. Thus, repurposing of known drugs could significantly accelerate the deployment of novel therapies for COVID-19. Towards this end, we profiled a library of known drugs encompassing approximately 12,000 clinical-stage or FDA-approved small molecules. We report the identification of 100 molecules that inhibit viral replication, including 21 known drugs that exhibit dose response relationships. Of these, thirteen were found to harbor effective concentrations likely commensurate with achievable therapeutic doses in patients, including the PIKfyve kinase inhibitor apilimod2–4, and the cysteine protease inhibitors MDL-28170, Z LVG CHN2, VBY-825, and ONO 5334. Notably, MDL-28170, ONO 5334, and apilimod were found to antagonize viral replication in human iPSC-derived pneumocyte-like cells, and the PIKfyve inhibitor also demonstrated antiviral efficacy in a primary human lung explant model. Since most of the molecules identified in this study have already advanced into the clinic, the known pharmacological and human safety profiles of these compounds will enable accelerated preclinical and clinical evaluation of these drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Laura Riva, Shuofeng Yuan

Affiliations

  1. Immunity and Pathogenesis Program, Infectious and Inflammatory Disease Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA

    Laura Riva, Xin Yin, Laura Martin-Sancho, Naoko Matsunaga, Lars Pache, Paul D. De Jesus, Peter Teriete, Kristina M. Herbert, Andrey Rubanov, Yuan Pu, Courtney Nguyen & Sumit K. Chanda

  2. State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Department of Microbiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China

    Shuofeng Yuan, Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan, Jianli Cao, Vincent Kwok-Man Poon & Kwok-Yung Yuen

  3. Center for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Max Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Sebastian Burgstaller-Muehlbacher

  4. Calibr at Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA

    Mitchell V. Hull, Tu-Trinh H. Nguyen, Peter G. Schultz & Arnab K. Chatterjee

  5. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA

    Max W. Chang & Christopher Benner

  6. Cancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Kuoyuan Cheng & Eytan Ruppin

  7. Biological Sciences Graduate Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Kuoyuan Cheng

  8. Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Angela Choi, Raveen Rathnasinghe, Michael Schotsaert, Lisa Miorin, Wen-Chun Liu, Kris M. White, Randy Albrecht, Jeffrey R. Johnson & Adolfo García-Sastre

  9. Global Health and Emerging pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Angela Choi, Raveen Rathnasinghe, Michael Schotsaert, Lisa Miorin, Wen-Chun Liu, Kris M. White, Randy Albrecht & Adolfo García-Sastre

  10. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA

    Angela Choi & Raveen Rathnasinghe

  11. Huffington Foundation Center for Cell-based Research in Parkinson‘s Disease, Department for Cell, Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Marion Dejosez & Thomas P. Zwaka

  12. Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China

    Ko-Yung Sit

  13. Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Luis Martinez-Sobrido

  14. Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Mackenzie E. Chapman & Andrew D. Mesecar

  15. Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Emma K. Lendy & Andrew D. Mesecar

  16. Inception Therapeutics, 6175 Nancy Ridge Dr, San Diego, 92121, USA

    Richard J. Glynne

  17. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Ren Sun

  18. Department of Integrative, Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Andrew I. Su

  19. Department of Medicine – Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Adolfo García-Sastre

  20. The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA

    Adolfo García-Sastre

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to
Arnab K. Chatterjee or Kwok-Yung Yuen or Sumit K. Chanda.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains a Supplementary Discussion of the limitations and bias associated with the CPE-based primary screen performed in Vero E6 cells and its IF-based orthogonal validation. It also contains Supplementary Figure 1, a depiction of the gating strategy for flow cytometry analyses of iPSC-derived pneumocyte-like cells.

Enriched drug targets

Supplementary Table 1 . A list of drug targets enriched in GSEA analysis of HTS data.

RNAseq and GSEA analyses

Supplementary Table 2 . Processed RNAseq data from mock-infected and SARS-CoV-2 infected Vero E6 cells (MOI=0.3) collected 24 hpi (“RNAseq_Vero E6”). GSEA analysis of these RNAseq dataset (“GSEA_Vero E6”) and GSAE analysis of publicly available RNA-seq dataset of nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected from COVID-19 patients (“GSEA_Mason’s paper”). P-values were calculated as described in the materials and methods.

List of validated antiviral compounds

Supplementary Table 3 . A list of compounds confirmed to inhibit infection by 40 % or more at a single dose (1 or 2.5 µM) in Vero E6 cells.

List of the 21 most potent compounds validated in dose response across multiple cell lines

Supplementary Table 4 . Activities, reported mechanism of action (MOA), and clinical profiles of the most potent 21 compounds with dose-activity relationships listed in Figure 3. The target class and the likely antiviral mechanism are also indicated. NA- not available; QD- once daily; BID-twice daily. Information retrieved from CortellisTM (Clarivate Analytics) and drugbank.com.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riva, L., Yuan, S., Yin, X. et al. Discovery of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral drugs through large-scale compound repurposing.
Nature (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2577-1

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Read More

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here