London Escorts sunderland escorts asyabahis.org dumanbet.live pinbahiscasino.com sekabet.net www.olabahisgir.com maltcasino.net faffbet-giris.com asyabahisgo1.com www.dumanbetyenigiris.com pinbahisgo1.com sekabet-giris2.com www.olabahisgo.com maltcasino-giris.com faffbet.net betforward1.org www.betforward.mobi 1xbet-adres.com 1xbet4iran.com romabet1.com www.yasbet2.net www.1xirani.com www.romabet.top www.3btforward1.com 1xbet https://1xbet-farsi4.com بهترین سایت شرط بندی betforward

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
Home Blog Page 936

COVID-19 ‘clusters’ reported at childcare facility, high school in Iredell County

0
COVID-19 ‘clusters’ reported at childcare facility, high school in Iredell County

July 3, 2020 at 8:44 AM EDT – Updated July 3 at 1:13 PM

IREDELL COUNTY, N.C. (WBTV) – Clusters of COVID-19 cases have been reported in a daycare facility and a high school in Iredell County.

The report came Friday, just days after NCDHHS Secretery Mandy Cohen announced the state would begin reporting coronavirus “clusters,” which are considered five or more cases.

A cluster of cases was reported at Primrose School of Lake Norman. Another cluster was reported at a school in the area. NCDHHS reports five staff members at North Iredell High School have confirmed cases of COVID-19.

The Primrose School of Lake Norman in Mooresville is closed due to a cluster. NCDHHS says there are three cases in staff and two cases in students. pic.twitter.com/8ihBQHdfAh

— Kristi O’Connor WBTV (@KristiOConnor_) July 3, 2020

“NCDHHS refers to this as a ‘cluster’ rather than an ‘outbreak’ because of the setting, as it is difficult to accurately determine how transmission occurred and whether it occurred within the setting or from within the broader community,” the Iredell County Health Department says.

The Primrose School of Lake Norman says the facility will be closed through July 13 while it is sanitized. Health leaders say they will continue to contact trace to identify anyone who came in contact with an infected person.

Becky and Doug Bradley, franchise owners of Primrose School of Lake Norman, released the following statement:

“At Primrose School of Lake Norman, our highest priority is to ensure the health, safety and security of our staff and every child entrusted to our care. Upon learning of two teachers’ positive COVID-19 diagnoses on June 24, we immediately notified our staff and enrolled families, including personally contacting the parents of children in the affected classrooms. Additionally, we notified Iredell County Health Department and made the decision to close the school for two days to allow time to deep clean and sanitize.  

“Since then, we have continued to remain in close contact with the Iredell County Health Department as we learned of additional cases. Out of an abundance of caution, we have chosen to extend our school closure through July 13. When we reopen, we will continue our rigorous health and safety measures that include, but are not limited to: cleaning and sanitizing the school daily; sanitation fogging; frequent handwashing; parent drop off outside of the building; and temperature and symptom monitoring.

“Our thoughts and wishes for a rapid recovery and good health are with the affected children and staff and their families.”

There is also a cluster of cases at Smart Kids #3 Childcare Center in Mecklenburg County, where DHHS reports one staff member and five children have confirmed cases of COVID-19.

There is also a cluster of cases at Smart Kids #3 Childcare Center in Mecklenburg County. DHHS reports 1 staff member and five children have confirmed cases of COVID-19.

— Kristi O’Connor WBTV (@KristiOConnor_) July 3, 2020

Iredell County Public Health officials released the following ways people can protect themselves and lessen the spread of COVID-19:

  • Practice social distancing, which means avoiding gatherings of more than 10 people and keeping 6 feet or more between yourself and others
  • Frequent hand washing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after going to the bathroom, before eating, and after blowing your nose, coughing or sneezing
  • If soap and water are not readily available, use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60 percent alcohol
  • Cover your cough or sneeze with a tissue, then throw it in the trash
  • Stay home when you’re sick
  • Keep distance from others who are sick
  • Avoid touching your face
  • Clean and disinfect high touch surfaces in common areas like doorknobs, remotes, light switches, tables and handles.
  • Wear cloth mask or face covering when out in public where you may be around people, like grocery stores or pharmacies, and still try to practice social distancing

On June 24, Cooper announced that residents would be required to wear face masks in public and that the state’s Phase 2 will continue for three more weeks, as coronavirus cases continue to rise at an alarming rate.

“The Iredell County Health Department has been encouraging all schools and child-care providers to follow the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention guidelines and State directives meant to curb the spread of COVID19,” Iredell County health leaders say, which includes:

  • Promoting healthy hygiene practices
  • Monitoring the health of staff prior to their entrance into the building
  • Elevated cleaning, sanitizing
  • Proper ventilation
  • Promoting social distancing

Copyright 2020 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Read More

Local US Data Show Where The Coronavirus Is On The March : Shots

0
Local US Data Show Where The Coronavirus Is On The March : Shots

Medical personnel prepare to test hundreds of people for the coronavirus. They lined up in vehicles last week in a Phoenix neighborhood.

Matt York/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Matt York/AP

Medical personnel prepare to test hundreds of people for the coronavirus. They lined up in vehicles last week in a Phoenix neighborhood.

Matt York/AP

Across the United States the coronavirus is once again on the march. On Wednesday alone there were nearly 50,000 new cases — a record. The case counts for each state suggest the disease is mainly spreading in a band stretching from Florida across much of the southernmost states and westward to California, with Idaho and Iowa also in trouble.

But when you use tools to drill down to more local data, the picture gets more complicated — and even more concerning. Here are five takeaways:

Green, Yellow, Orange Or Red? This New Tool Shows COVID-19 Risk In Your County

It may be time for a statewide lockdown in Arizona and Florida

A key measure that epidemiologists track is the number of new coronavirus cases each day as a percentage of the population. (This per capita approach is key because it flags less populous locations that may have a large amount of spread relative to their size — and potentially more cases than their health systems are set up to deal with.)

This week a team led by researchers at Harvard came up with a rating tool with four tiers: The highest “red” alert level — triggered if a location has more than 25 new cases per day per 100,000 people — means the virus is spreading to such a degree that evidence suggests the only way to get a handle on it is to revert to stay-at-home mode. At this stage even less drastic measures such as massively ramped-up testing and contact tracing probably won’t cut it.

Technically, three states currently fall in this category: Arizona, Florida and South Carolina. But use the tool to check the situation at the county level, and the virus’s reach through Arizona in particular becomes apparent. Nearly two-thirds of the state’s counties are in the red zone — compared with about a third of South Carolina’s counties.

“I’m very worried about Arizona,” says Thomas Tsai, one of the Harvard professors who put together the tool. “We knew about the outbreak in Navajo Nation. And now we’re seeing that that entire northeast corner of Arizona, and realistically, most of Arizona, is becoming red and poses a risk of the pandemic growing out of proportion.”

Florida concerns him for the same reason. “Before the focus was really on the metropolitan areas around Miami,” Tsai says. “But now we’re seeing that counties in central Florida and even some counties in the panhandle — which had relatively few cases early on in the pandemic — are seeing an escalating rise in cases.”

There’s trouble in Texas

On the one hand Texas offers a sharp contrast. For now, transmission is mainly occurring in the state’s large cities, notes Marynia Kolak, leader of a University of Chicago team that has created another tool with county-level data. “So they have the potential to contain the outbreak before it continues,” Kolak says.

But by another measure Texas is in major trouble. A team from Dartmouth has created a tool that tracks not just how many new cases local areas are seeing per day but how quickly the overall caseload is rising each week. And the top three localities are in Texas — including the Corpus Christi area, where cases rose more than 15% over the past week. (Technically the Dartmouth tool divides areas not by county, but by communities using the same set of hospitals.)

Corpus Christi also ranks in the top 10 when it comes to daily new case counts per capita. “It’s a double whammy,” says Elliott Fisher, who spearheaded the Dartmouth tool. “It’s a place with one of the highest number of new cases and the highest growth rate. So they really need to get their act together.”

Other localities in this double-whammy category that he points to include the Victoria and Austin areas in Texas, and — in Florida — Tampa, Miami, Orlando and Jacksonville.

Hot spots are cropping up in otherwise better-off states

The local-level tools also highlight flare-ups in counties that would otherwise be overlooked because they are in states where the overall spread is not as serious.

“A cluster has to be pretty severe in order for the state to emerge as a hot spot,” the University of Chicago’s Kolak says. Yet the history of the pandemic thus far has shown that isolated flare-ups can eventually widen out with catastrophic consequences.

“Sometimes those progress and grow into larger clusters. Sometimes they don’t. So we consider those areas potential emerging risks.”

Harvard’s Tsai points to Yakima County in Washington state as one that concerns him. Other examples include counties in California and Iowa. But it’s worth noting that the vast majority of counties in the Harvard group’s red zone are not in the three red zone states.

State borders pose a challenge

The Chicago group’s tool also includes a feature that surfaces emerging regional clusters by identifying counties where the daily per capita new case number is high both there and in neighboring counties.

“What this shows is not just hot spots at a state level, but you start to notice that there’s a lot of hot spots occurring along the borders of states,” Kolak says.

Examples include between Southern California and Arizona as well as along the Mississippi River — with cases high in both the Memphis, Tenn., area and across the border in Arkansas.

This border issue points up a challenge for states, Kolak says. “There’s definite concern there, because unless you have a federally coordinated response, anything that one of those states does may not necessarily have a full impact unless the nearby states also agree.”

The choices that citizens make also play into this, she says. “So for example, if you’re in a state that has very strict social distancing guidelines, but the state next to you has very relaxed ones — driving [there] to get a haircut” could foment cross-border spread.

Ordinary citizens should check the county-level tools

While the tools described are mainly helpful to scientists and policymakers trying to detect and respond to broader trends, all of us may benefit from checking them more or less the way we look at the weather report.

Dartmouth’s Fisher says looking up the new-daily-cases-per-capita measure is a proxy for checking, “What is the likelihood that the person standing in line with you at a Starbucks [in your county] might give you COVID-19.”

Chicago’s Kolak agrees. The July Fourth celebrations are largely canceled in her area, she says. But she says she’s worried by talk that many people are planning to travel to fireworks displays farther afield.

Based on what her county-level mapping tool shows, “I’ve been encouraging friends not to go to Iowa for the July [Fourth] fireworks,” she says. “In some of those areas, cases are still pretty low. But there are counties that are starting to persistently get flagged as high relative to the nearby areas.”

Read More

Couple who pulled guns on Black mother and daughters charged with felony assault

0
Couple who pulled guns on Black mother and daughters charged with felony assault

A white couple from Clarkston, Michigan, was arrested and charged with a felony after a video showed the woman pointing a gun at a Black mother and her two daughters.

Jillian Wuestenberg, 32, and Eric Wuestenberg, 42, were taken into custody on Wednesday, the same day they got into an altercation with the family at a Chipotle in Orion Township.

The Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office announced Thursday that the Wuestenbergs were charged with felonious assault.

Deputies were called to the Chipotle around 6 p.m. local time for reports of threats involving a firearm, the Oakland County Sheriff’s Office said in a press release. Both the Wuestenbergs and the family, whom authorities did not identify, had called police on each other.

Part of the altercation was captured on cellphone video and shows two women off-camera accusing Jillian Wuestenberg of bumping into them. Eric Wuestenberg enters the frame and helps his wife get into their car before exchanging words with the mother.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Jillian Deanne Wuestenberg, 32, and Eric Peter Wuestenber, 42.Oakland County Sheriff’s Office

Things quickly escalate after Eric Wuestenberg begins to reverse the vehicle out of the parking spot.

“You gonna f—ing hit me,” the mother yells. Both groups begin arguing and the video shows Jillian Wuestenberg get out of the car and point a gun at the mother.

“Get away,” Jillian Wuestenberg says, telling her husband to call the police. “Get the f— away.”

The video ends with Jillian Wuestenberg getting back into the car and the couple driving away. The footage does not show what led up to the altercation but Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard said that it began when one group bumped into the other.

“There was a bump as they entered and exit. The one person said they didn’t realize they had bumped the person with the food bag and the other person felt they needed to get an apology and it escalated from there,” the sheriff said at a news conference Thursday.

Jillian Wuestenberg and her husband, who are concealed pistol license holders, told deputies that they feared for their lives after threatening comments were directed at them, according to the sheriff’s office press release.

The mother and daughters told deputies that the Wuestenbergs threatened them with firearms.

The Wuestenbergs were arraigned on the charges Thursday and each was given a $50,000 personal bond. As part of the bond conditions, they have to surrender all firearms and are prohibited from leaving the state. It’s not clear if they have obtained attorneys.

Eric Wuestenberg was an employee at Oakland University. The school said in a statement Friday to NBC News that it found “his behavior unacceptable” and he has since been fired.

Image: Minyvonne BurkeMinyvonne Burke

Minyvonne Burke is a breaking news reporter for NBC News.

Read More

Local Communities Should Sue to Keep University Campuses Closed

0
Local Communities Should Sue to Keep University Campuses Closed

Jurisprudence

A locked gate at Clemson Memorial Stadium on June 10

Clemson University’s campus remains open in a limited capacity during the pandemic.
Maddie Meyer/Getty Images

The relationship between universities and their neighbors is notoriously complex. COVID-19 is about to make it worse. With schools across the country planning to bring students back to campuses as early as August, surrounding areas are likely to see sharp spikes in COVID-19 cases. Local governments, businesses, and individual residents need not be sitting ducks. They can, and should, sue now to prevent campus reopenings, or to require universities to implement safety measures that will protect surrounding communities.

Universities do not and cannot operate in a bubble. Students, faculty, and staff live off campus, use public transportation to get to and from campus, go grocery shopping, have families with children who go to school and spouses who work at area businesses. If a campus becomes a locus of COVID-19 infections, the disease can rapidly spread throughout an entire area. Knock-on effects include burdening local hospital capacity, endangering the health of medical personnel and other front-line workers, possibly precipitating economically damaging lockdowns, and exacerbating racial disparities in whom the pandemic strikes and how hard.

While faculty are flagging such problems for university administrators and in some cases pushing back against the reopenings, they are not the only ones who can take action now to avert these consequences. A wide range of individuals and organizations can and should take preemptive legal action, suing colleges on the grounds that reopened campuses threaten the public good. To bring these suits, parties have to show that they will suffer harms over and above those to the general welfare. Many individuals and organizations are situated to do this.

For example, a local chapter of the National Education Association or the American Federation of Teachers—the unions that organize K–12 teachers throughout the country—could file a claim on behalf of its members based on the anticipated extra burden on local teachers and their students should the university drive up infections as grade schools attempt to reopen as well. School boards and parents’ associations could join in such claims. Similarly, a hospital that serves the community could file a claim on the grounds that bringing students from all over the country to be in relatively close quarters is likely to lead to ICU bed overload.

By showing that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm if campuses reopen, vulnerable persons who live near universities, hospitals, service worker unions, and local governments—among others—should be able to obtain specific, anticipatory relief. Remedies could range from requirements to take specific precautionary measures, including reengineering campus buildings to minimize chances of infection spreading, to mandates that all or almost all instruction be conducted wholly online without reopening buildings.

Those who neighbor universities might be able to approach them informally first to seek commitments that the schools will take specific steps to prevent their campuses from becoming sources of disease. Hospitals and local governments might request upfront financial contributions to alleviate pandemic-related strains that campus reopenings will put on health care systems and other local infrastructure. If universities are not amenable to such overtures, then a formal legal proceeding can be brought.

Colleges and universities naturally first consider their own needs and interests. When it comes to COVID-19, it is more imperative than ever that they also attend to those off campus whom they affect so powerfully. Their neighbors have a right to such consideration. If it is not forthcoming, public nuisance law provides a legal tool for getting it.

It makes more sense for those likely to be sickened or otherwise harmed by university reopenings during this pandemic to pursue prophylactic legal action rather than await the harms and sue for damages later. By considering and formulating nuisance actions now, those who live and work near colleges can gain a voice in how these institutions conduct themselves this fall and for as long as COVID-19 poses substantial risks.


Read More

Trump visit to Mount Rushmore to be greeted by protests, wildfire fears

0
Trump visit to Mount Rushmore to be greeted by protests, wildfire fears

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — President Donald Trump will begin his Independence Day weekend on Friday with a patriotic display of fireworks at Mount Rushmore before a crowd of thousands, but even in a part of the country where many remain supportive of the president, the event has drawn controversy and protests.

Trump is expected to speak at the event, which has issued 7,500 tickets to watch fireworks that he previewed on Thursday as a “display like few people have seen.” The president will likely enjoy a show of support, with the state Republican Party selling T-shirts that feature Trump on the memorial alongside George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. But concern about the coronavirus risk and wildfire danger from the fireworks, along with protests from Native American groups, will also greet the president.

Republican Gov. Kristi Noem, a Trump ally, has said social distancing won’t be required during the event and masks will be optional. Event organizers will provide masks to anyone who wants them and plan to screen attendees for symptoms of COVID-19.

The Republican mayor of the largest city near the monument, Rapid City, said he is watching for a spike in cases after the event, the Rapid City Journal reported.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

“We’re going to have thousands of people, shoulder to shoulder at these events — someone in line to see a president and being able to see fireworks at Mount Rushmore — they are probably not likely to disqualify themself because they developed a cough the day of or the day before,” Rapid City Mayor Steve Allender said.

Leaders of several Native American tribes in the region also raised concerns that the event could lead to coronavirus outbreaks among their members, who they say are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 because of an underfunded health care system and chronic health conditions.

“The president is putting our tribal members at risk to stage a photo op at one of our most sacred sites,” said Harold Frazier, chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.

Some Native American groups are using Trump’s visit to protest the Mount Rushmore memorial itself, pointing out that the Black Hills were taken from the Lakota people against treaty agreements.

Protests are expected in Keystone, the small town near the monument. Chase Iron Eyes, a spokesman for the Oglala Sioux president, said protesters would like to make their voice heard at the memorial itself, but it’s not clear they’ll be able to get close.

Security is expected to be tight, with the road leading up to Mount Rushmore shut down. The governor’s spokesperson, Maggie Seidel, would not say whether the South Dakota National Guard was being deployed, but said organizers are making sure it is a safe event.

But several people who once oversaw fire danger at the national memorial have said setting off fireworks over the forest is a bad idea that could lead to a large wildfire. Fireworks were called off after 2009 because a mountain pine beetle infestation increased the fire risks.

Noem pushed to get the fireworks resumed soon after she was elected, and enlisted Trump’s help. The president brushed aside fire concerns earlier this year, saying, “What can burn? It’s stone.”

The National Park Service studied the potential effect of the fireworks for this year and found they would be safe, though it noted that in a dry year, a large fire was a risk. Organizers are monitoring the fire conditions and were to decide Friday if the fireworks are safe.

Trump made no mention of the fire danger in fresh comments Thursday.

“They used to do it many years ago, and for some reason they were unable or unallowed to do it,” he said. “They just weren’t allowed to do it, and I opened it up and we’re going to have a tremendous July 3 and then we’re coming back here, celebrating the Fourth of July in Washington, D.C.”

Read More

Fourth of July celebrations increase risk of ‘superspreader’ events, experts warn

0
Fourth of July celebrations increase risk of ‘superspreader’ events, experts warn

The Fourth of July is traditionally for barbecues, fireworks, boisterous partying and various hijinks to celebrate Independence Day. But this year, with coronavirus cases soaring to all-time highs, m…
Read More

Allie Beth Stuckey: Harvard grad wrong to blame firing over ‘stab’ video on Trump supporters but deserves g…

0
Allie Beth Stuckey: Harvard grad wrong to blame firing over ‘stab’ video on Trump supporters but deserves g…

When Harvard graduate Claira Janover posted a video to TikTok stating her distaste for people who say “all lives matter,” she likely wasn’t expecting the widespread backlash that would ensue on the Internet, much less the termination of her employment at Deloitte.

In subsequent TikTok videos, she criticizes Deloitte for their “cowardice” and claims, “Trump supporters took my job away from me” because of her videos “standing up for Black Lives Matter.”

But, that’s not what appeared to have happened. Social media users weren’t appalled because she publicly supports Black Lives Matter, as many people do; they were taken aback by the aggression with which Janover spoke about people who represent a differing point of view.

HARVARD GRAD BLAMES TRUMP SUPPORTERS AFTER ‘STAB’ VIDEO COSTS HER DELOITTE JOB

In the original video, Janover said she’d like to “stab” people who claim “all lives matter.” She continued: “While you’re struggling and bleeding out, I’ma show you my paper cut and say, ‘My cut matters too.’”

While we can assume she’s drawing an analogy for what she sees as the illogic of saying “all lives matter,” it’s still an unusually cruel way of making a point. Her flippant use of violent imagery is what drew people’s ire, and that’s why, presumably, she lost her job at Deloitte.

Some commentators have pointed out that this is an example of the “cancel culture” conservatives often complain about and that it’s thus hypocritical for conservatives to applaud Deloitte for their decision. I disagree. Cancel culture typically seeks to ruin the lives of people who violated political correctness either recently or decades ago. That’s not what happened here.

More from Opinion

Janover’s comments at best made light of violence and at worst threatened it. That’s the kind of thing that would have always, even before the age of Twitter and TikTok, gotten employees of major companies fired. It reflects poorly on the employer. Stating a political opinion is one thing; publicly talking about stabbing someone who disagrees with you—even sarcastically—is another.

Janover claims to have received death threats from “Trump supporters,” and if that’s true, it’s wrong. No one should ever be subjected to threats of violence, empty or not. Janover simply needs to realize that that includes people who disagree with her, too.

As I’m sure she didn’t feel those who have allegedly threatened her were joking, many didn’t take her TikTok video as a joke, either. It’s probably just a good rule of thumb not to seriously or facetiously talk about assaulting and killing people who hold different political opinions than you.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR OPINION NEWSLETTER

The best outcome would be for Janover to learn a valuable lesson—don’t trivialize violence, and definitely don’t post about it online—and for her to move on with her life. We shouldn’t hope the worst for her. Everyone makes mistakes. Where leftist cancel culture refuses to offer grace, we should extend it.

Unfortunately, from what we can see, Janover isn’t interested in self-reflection. Her subsequent TikTok videos blaming Trump supporters for her woes demonstrate a stunning lack of self-awareness and an unwillingness to take responsibility for her words. In my view, she doesn’t owe the mob of faceless internet users an apology, but she would do well to show more respect to her former employer than to call them cowards. It’s hard to imagine that kind of attitude bodes well for future job prospects.

It seems Janover’s disposition is characteristic of many members of the elite left who believe even the most intensely aggressive speech is appropriate and without need of real-life accountability—as long as it’s for the “right” cause. Viral videos of predominantly female protesters screaming profanities in the faces of police officers show that many believe that the standards of decency and respectfulness don’t apply to people who take up the noble fight for wokeness.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Free speech is vital for a thriving society. Of course, no one’s speech should be punished or inhibited by the government, and companies should foster an environment that allows for and accepts a diversity of viewpoints. But there always have been expectations employers have for their employees when it comes to public conduct. Deloitte drew the line at violent analogies on TikTok, and it seems like a reasonable one.

What can the rest of us learn? That the words we use matter, and we should be wise and deferential in choosing them. And, when we fail—because we all do—we should take responsibility and own our mistakes. And when others make mistakes, we should offer forgiveness in return. If we as a society abided by these three things—wisdom, personal responsibility and grace— we’d all be much better off.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY ALLIE BETH STUCKEY

Read More

Redskins to conduct ‘thorough review’ of team name amid intense scrutiny

0
Redskins to conduct ‘thorough review’ of team name amid intense scrutiny

The Washington Redskins will conduct a “thorough review” of its name as the organization faces immense pressure to change its moniker over racial connotations.

The team released a statement on the issue Friday.

NIKE PULLS WASHINGTON REDSKINS APPAREL FROM ITS WEBSITE AMID TEAM NAME CONTROVERSY

“In light of recent events around our country and feedback from our community, the Washington Redskins are announcing the team will undergo a thorough review of the team’s name. The review formalizes the initial discussions the team has been having with the league in recent events.

Team owner Daniel Snyder also commented on the issue.

“This process allows the team to take into account not only the proud tradition and history of the franchise but also input from our alumni, the organization, sponsors, the National Football League and the local community it is proud to represent on and off the field.”

Redskins coach Ron Rivera said the issue was in “personal importance.”

REDSKINS’ DANIEL SNYDER HAS THUMBED HIS NOSE AT CHANGING TEAM’S NAME, NOW DEMANDS ARE AT FEVER PITCH

“This issue is of personal importance to me and I look forward to working closely with Dan Snyder to make sure we continue the mission of honoring and supporting Native Americans and our Military,” the coach said.

Washington received support from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.

“In the last few weeks we have had ongoing discussions with Dan and we are supportive of this important step,” Goodell said in a statement.

The franchise came under scrutiny this week as it was revealed the team is reportedly barred from seeking a move from FedEx Field in Maryland to RFK Stadium in Washington unless the team changes its name.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

A day later, FedEx formally requested the Redskins to change their name. FedEx is a corporate sponsor of the Redskins and the NFL. Nike would later remove Redskins gear from its online store and Pepsi would follow suit and ask the team to change its name as well.

Snyder has previously been adamant about not changing the team’s name.

Read More

Behind the scenes of Mount Rushmore’s Independence Day fireworks display

0
Behind the scenes of Mount Rushmore’s Independence Day fireworks display

In light of the coronavirus pandemic, fears that fireworks displays will attract thousands of spectators has caused cities across the U.S. to cancel Independ…
Read More

Harvard, Yale And Princeton Embarrass, But Cornell Shines

0
Harvard, Yale And Princeton Embarrass, But Cornell Shines

Ezra Cornell statue on the campus or Cornell University...

Ezra Cornell statue on the campus or Cornell University. (Photo by John Greim/LightRocket via Getty … [+] Images)


LightRocket via Getty Images

In the last week or so, I have read about happenings at several Ivy League schools, most predictably wretched, but at least one, at Cornell, showing much intelligence and concern for students. Let’s talk about four schools, in order of founding.

Harvard, America’s first university, finally relented and dropped its controversial policy restricting student rights to free association outside of their studies, namely the policy banning single-gender organizations, rather ironic for a university that banned female students for the first one-third of a millennium (more than 85%) of its history. While Harvard’s policy change is good, President Lawrence Bacow made it clear that he acted only because he had to: federal courts were going to force Harvard to do so.

As the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Executive Director Robert Shibley put it “While this “Crimson Scare’ is finally over, lasting damage has been done to many cherished men’s and women’s groups that either shut down or were muscled into changing their policies against their wishes.” Meanwhile, Harvard’s administration and faculty maintains its freedom of association from students: it plans to use almost fully remote instruction this fall, even though students likely will gather in Cambridge to party and Zoom.

Moving on to Yale, President Peter Salovey appropriately rejected protesters who said the name “Yale” should be removed from the institution —-the ultimate expression of the Cancel Culture. Elihu Yale was a slave trader holding views considered reprehensible by most civilized American adults today, but helped fund an institution that has educated young people for more than three centuries. Salovey does not always show such common sense: In 2015, he and his aides refused to defend Erika Christakis for daring to suggest it was not Yale’s job to tell students what kind of Halloween costumes to wear, ultimately hounding her and husband Dr. Nicholas Christakis off campus. Yale was quick to take John Calhoun’s name off of a college, for he, too, owned slaves and defended the Southern way of life 180 years ago. Implicitly Yale is saying, “our current generation of Yalies is morally superior to the scum who founded, funded and nurtured us,” so we must erase recognition of their accomplishment. It shows a contempt for our history, heritage and ancestors that I find morally dubious.

Going to Princeton, more of the same. Woodrow Wilson’s name must go, even though he was good enough for Princeton to make him its president for eight years. It is true that Wilson was a racist and more: he said contemptuous things about immigrants from southern Europe, for example. Personally, I think he was one of the most overrated presidents in American history. Yet I think it was wrong for Princeton to show its ingratitude for a man important in the shaping of both that school and the nation. Again, the current anti-historical mood: “We are morally upright and our predecessors were scum” is, in my judgment, despicable, even though I equally believe that the evolution of moral standards over time to rejecting racial discrimination has been a wonderful thing.

Enough negativism. Let us turn to the last created Ivy League school, one more democratic and less elitist than the other Ivies (it is, horror of horrors, partly a public university): Cornell. Provost Michael Kotlikoff and President Martha Pollack have declared Cornell will reopen this fall for classes (see their superb July 1 Wall Street Journal op-ed). The school will track and isolate Covid-19 cases and take other measures to insure safety. They make a great point: if students did not return to traditional classes, Covid cases would probably not fall, maybe even rise —students would simply be living at least part of the day in a different environment. And large portions of the student body would return to campus anyway and, outside of class-time, party and socialize in a distinctly non-social distancing manner. Public health would be imperiled, not improved. Moreover, students need socialization, direct interaction with other students, etc. (See the recent superb statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics supporting in-class instruction of younger students). That is why I, celebrating my 80th birthday this fall, plan to return to teach in person unless apparatchiks at Ohio University successfully stop me.

My latest book is Restoring the Promise: Higher Education in America.

Read More