Amid a recession and social unrest, the cannabis industry sees its moment.
Read More
Why more states could legalize cannabis in 2021
The Michael Flynn court ruling by Judge Neomi Rao is astonishingly bad
Judge Neomi Rao’s opinion in In re: Michael T. Flynn is simply astonishing.
It involves the Justice Department’s surprising decision to drop charges against one of President Trump’s former top aides — nearly three years after that aide plead guilty to lying to the FBI. And Rao’s opinion takes extraordinary liberties with the law.
Her opinion asserts jurisdiction over a case that Rao’s court has no right to hear. It relies on a rarely invoked process that the Supreme Court described as a “drastic and extraordinary remedy” that’s “reserved for really extraordinary causes.” And it keeps a trial judge from hearing arguments that Rao and one of her Republican colleagues, Judge Karen Henderson, apparently believe that the trial judge shouldn’t even be allowed to ponder before making a decision.
Nor is Rao’s opinion in Flynn out of character for the recently appointed jurist. In less than two years on the bench, Rao has repeatedly handed down opinions benefiting Trump and his aides that rely on highly dubious legal reasoning.
The only saving grace of the court’s decision in Flynn is that Rao and Henderson are far-right outliers on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. There is a chance that the full court — which has the power to reconsider Rao’s opinion even if no party requests such a reconsideration — will toss Rao’s opinion in the trash.
The case involves the Trump Justice Department’s decision to drop charges against a former Trump aide
The case arises out of the Justice Department’s abrupt decision to abandon its successful prosecution of Michael Flynn, a former general who briefly served as President’s Trump’s national security adviser. In 2017, Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI regarding his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the United States.
Nearly three years later, however, the Justice Department decided to drop the charges against the former Trump aide. Though the DOJ admits that Flynn lied to investigators, the Justice Department now claims that these lies could not have “conceivably ‘influenced’ an investigation that had neither legitimate or counterintelligence or criminal purpose.”
Notably, the Justice Department’s court filing seeking to drop the charges is signed only by a single political appointee. Typically, such filings are also signed by career Justice Department attorneys with no loyalty to a particular administration or party.
Brandon Van Grack, the lead prosecutor against Flynn, withdrew from the case shortly before the Justice Department sided with Flynn.
The trial judge wants to hear a full range of arguments before disposing of Flynn’s case
It is highly unusual for prosecutors to drop charges years after obtaining a guilty plea. Moreover, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure only permit the government to dismiss a prosecution “with leave of court.” So Judge Emmet Sullivan, the trial judge presiding over this case, decided to hold a hearing next month to address how he should proceed — and to also consider whether Flynn should be held in contempt for perjury, a charge that a court may pursue without the consent of the Justice Department.
Because the Justice Department abandoned its prosecution, Sullivan also asked a court-appointed lawyer to argue the case against Flynn. This is a common practice when none of the attorneys appearing in a case have presented important arguments at the heart of that case. In Seila Law v. CFPB, for example, the Supreme Court recently appointed former Solicitor General Paul Clement to defend a lower court ruling that none of the parties to Seila Law agree with.
Notably, Sullivan has not taken any action whatsoever against Flynn. He has not ruled that the guilty plea must be preserved over the Justice Department’s objection. Nor has he held Flynn in contempt. Judge Sullivan has merely scheduled a hearing and asked a lawyer to brief him on the best legal arguments against Flynn’s position before Sullivan makes a ruling.
Judge Rao’s opinion bypasses the judiciary’s ordinary procedures
Should Sullivan ultimately rule against Flynn — again, there is no guarantee that he will — that order can be appealed to the DC Circuit. Nevertheless, Rao’s opinion concludes that Sullivan isn’t even allowed to consider arguments that cut against Flynn’s interests.
The thrust of Rao’s opinion is that “decisions to dismiss pending criminal charges — no less than decisions to initiate charges and to identify which charges to bring — lie squarely within the ken of prosecutorial discretion.” So, if prosecutors decide to dismiss charges against an individual, that’s the end of the case.
Perhaps Rao is correct about this — although there are many historical examples of court-appointed lawyers prosecuting federal crimes — but the core problem with her opinion is that Rao’s court has no business intervening before Sullivan decides the case.
The “drastic and extraordinary remedy” sought by Flynn is known as a “writ of mandamus.” As Judge Robert Wilkins explains in a dissenting opinion, appeals courts may only grant mandamus relief if the person seeking such relief has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and “his right to the issuance of the writ is ‘clear and indisputable.’”
But Flynn absolutely has another adequate means to obtain the primary relief he seeks in this case: dismissal of the charges against him. Flynn and his lawyers can argue their case before Judge Sullivan. If Sullivan agrees to dismiss the charges, Flynn wins! If Sullivan does not dismiss the charges, Flynn can then appeal this case to the DC Circuit, which may very well rule in Flynn’s favor once the case is properly before that court.
Nor is Flynn’s right to mandamus relief “clear and indisputable.” To the contrary, the DC Circuit held in 2015 that “mandamus is inappropriate in the presence of an obvious means of review: direct appeal from final judgment.”
Thus, in their apparent zeal to grant relief for a former Trump aide, the two judges in the majority, Rao and Henderson, ignored the very strict limits preventing their court from issuing a writ of mandamus.
Rao has a history of writing dubious opinions that benefit Trump and his allies
Henderson is a very conservative judge who sometimes took positions to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s right when Henderson and Kavanaugh served together on the same court.
Meanwhile, Rao, who served in the Trump White House and only became a judge in 2019, has quickly built a reputation as a rubber stamp for the Trump administration’s preferred outcomes. She wrote a widely mocked dissenting opinion that would have blocked much of Congress’s power to investigate Trump. And she sought to delay the House’s ability to obtain documents related to former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian interference in the 2016 election.
She also would have stripped the federal judiciary of much of its authority to review the Trump administration’s efforts to swiftly deport immigrants.
Rao, however, is in the minority on her court. Currently, Democratic appointees control seven of the 11 active judgeships on the DC Circuit, and the full court has the power to vacate Rao’s opinion through a process known as “en banc” review.
So, while Rao reached pretty far to benefit a former Trump aide in Flynn, it is far from clear that she will have the final word.
Support Vox’s explanatory journalism
Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.
Kentucky and New York see high turnout for primary elections
Published on Jun 24, 2020
Voters in Kentucky, New York and Virginia cast ballots in state primary elections Tuesday, but it may take days before results are fully counted. CBS News political correspondent Ed O’Keefe joined CBSN to break down some of the most closely watched races.
The CBS News team wants to hear from you! Click here to share your feedback: https://cbs.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/for…
Subscribe to the CBS News Channel HERE: https://bit.ly/2uz8qYE
Watch CBSN live HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7
Follow CBS News on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/cbsnews/
Like CBS News on Facebook HERE: http://facebook.com/cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter HERE: http://twitter.com/cbsnews
Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream CBSN and local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites like Star Trek Discovery anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B
—
CBSN is the first digital streaming news network that will allow Internet-connected consumers to watch live, anchored news coverage on their connected TV and other devices. At launch, the network is available 24/7 and makes all of the resources of CBS News available directly on digital platforms with live, anchored coverage 15 hours each weekday. CBSN. Always On.
Pompeo increases bounty on new, shadowy ISIS leader to $10M as rumors of his death in Syria swirl
Almost nine months after the death of Islamic State (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi by U.S. Special Forces, it was rumored Tuesday morning that his successor — the shadowy Abu Ibrahim al-Quraishi — had also been taken out, this time in an American-led drone strike in the northern pocket of war-torn Syria at some point earlier this week.
According to Hassan Hassan, director of the Non-State Actors Program at the Center for Global Policy, the terrorist leader was traveling under a false name and identity — “Ahmed El Darwish” — in areas controlled by the Turkish-backed rebels.
While reports remain subject to speculation — and U.S. government officials have yet to confirm or deny the mounting murmurs — at the same time Tuesday morning, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the financial reward for information of the “new ISIS leader” had been increased from $5 million to $10 million.
While a far cry from the $25 million once offered for Baghdadi, the bounty bump is seemingly indicative of an increased push to squash the brutal insurgency, which has been slowly regaining a foothold in swaths of Iraq and Syria in recent months.
So who is al-Quraishi?
“Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Quraishi was a former officer in Saddam Hussein’s army and was considered one of the most prominent ISIS members in Baghdadi’s circle,” David Ibsen, executive director of the Counter Extremism Project (CEP), told Fox News. “After the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq and the capture of Hussein in 2003, Quraishi eventually became a general Sharia jurist for al-Qaeda.”
The al-Quraishi name given to him by ISIS implies that he descended from the Prophet Muhammad’s Quraysh tribe, which is typically considered a coveted prerequisite for becoming caliph.
Born into an Iraqi Turkman family in the once ISIS-controlled town of Tel Afar, he is one of the few non-Arabs to have ascended into a high-profile position — driven not only by his lineage but by his background as an Islamic scholar, having earned a degree in sharia law from the University of Mosul.
Quraishi, who is estimated to be in his late 30s, was — like Baghdadi — held by U.S. forces in the notorious Camp Bucca prison in southern Iraq, which is where he and the slain ISIS leader first met and bonded.
WILL THE UNREST IN LIBYA AND NATO’S SCHISM DRAG US BACK INTO CONFLICT?
Additionally known by the nom de guerre Hajji Abdallah, he was believed to have initially risen through the ranks as an Al Qaeda leader in Iraq and then became an ISIS deputy leader when the outfit splintered away. In 2014, Quraishi pledged allegiance to Baghdadi and rose to become one of his top lieutenants.
“Quraishi was one of the most respected of Baghdadi’s lieutenants. He continues to carry that respect, but he, of course, does not carry as much weight as Baghdadi, who founded the group and led its sweep throughout the Middle East, sparking the creation of ISIS provinces around the world and a propaganda machine that reaches as far as the shores of Australia and the cities of the United States,” Ibsen said. “While Quraishi is viewed as a more than capable replacement, he is unlikely to overshadow Baghdadi’s legacy.”
In March, Pompeo announced that al-Quraishi would be slapped with the “specially designated global terrorist” label — a bid to further cut him off him from financial resources and any other formal dealings, some two months after U.S. intelligence revealed that al-Quraishi’s true identity was Muhammad Sa’id Abdal-Rahman al-Mawla, also depicted as Muhammad Sa’id Abdal-Rahman al-Mawla al-Salwi.

A fighter of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) holds an ISIL flag and a weapon on a street in the city of Mosul, June 23, 2014. REUTERS/Stringer
He was appointed to the top spot in the days immediately following Baghdadi’s death in October 2019, having been delegated the likely heritor by the group’s shura council just over two months before the deadly raid. Even before ISIS took to its telegram channel to announce his role in the aftermath of Baghdadi’s death, the U.S. government had already deemed Quraishi a wanted man with a $5 million premium — but at the time, little was known about his credentials and clout.
Since then, the U.S. government has determined that al-Quraishi “helped drive and justify the abduction, slaughter, and trafficking of the Yazidi religious minority in northwest Iraq,” of which many thousands of girls and women were forced into sexual slavery and hundreds upon hundreds of men brainwashed into the fighting fold or simply slaughtered for their faith. Several military and intelligence sources further told Fox News that not only did Quraishi aid such genocide, but he was primarily responsible for crafting and “legalizing” the plan to decimate the Yazidi population.
“This reward is an important moment in our fight against ISIS and its branches and networks around the world. As ISIS is defeated on the battlefield, we are determined to identify and find the group’s leaders so that the global coalition of nations fighting to defeat ISIS can continue to destroy ISIS remnants and thwart its global ambitions,” the Rewards for Justice program stated.
But whether or not the targeting of terrorist leadership has any real value in depleting an organization is subject to debate.
“Unlike open-ended occupations, targeted approaches can be effective at eliminating anti-U.S. terror threats. While it may seem meaningful that there is a top leader the administration wants to take out, the reality is these kinds of operations almost never lead to strategic outcomes,” Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis said.
“Improved intelligence gathering and cooperation paired with the U.S. military’s strike capabilities are effective approaches to preempt transnational terrorist plots. Improved homeland security efforts likewise enhance U.S. security. The overly broad global war on terror — with regime change efforts and a large ground presence in the Middle East — are costly, counterproductive, and should end.”
But from the lens of Bill Roggio — senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD) and editor of FDD’s Long War Journal — the U.S. too often makes the fatal flaw of not going after the top tier fast and hard enough.
“Quraishi was a longtime, founding member of ISIS — considered to be both a military commander and someone with religious credibility,” he said. “It’s important we go after the leadership, but he is someone who has been waiting a long time. We don’t go after them hard enough.”
In terms of the new leader’s governing style, Mansour Al-Hadj, a senior researcher with the MEMR Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor (JTTM), observed that the new caliph seems to be focusing on two goals: carrying out more attacks and stressing his group’s legitimacy by accusing other jihadi groups of deviating from the path of jihad and allying with apostate governments.
“Under his leadership, the group has intensified its attacks in Iraq and expanded its operations in West and Central Africa. The group has focused on carrying out multiple and small scale attacks aimed at exhausting its enemies,” Hadj said. “ISIS has adopted a more aggressive stance against Al Qaeda and particularly its branches in Yemen and West Africa under his leadership and accused them of deviating from the path of jihad, refusing to implement sharia and allying with the local governments.”
HOW ISIS IS EXPLOITING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
And the uptick in Quraishi’s value announced this week, Ibsen pointed out, is indicative of the continued significance and threat of ISIS.
“Despite losing its physical caliphate, ISIS remains a dangerous threat, not just to the region but to the West as well. ISIS has shifted its strategy from acquiring and holding territory to that of a more traditional insurgency. We have seen this shift played out in ISIS’s propaganda for the past few years as its territorial hold shrank,” Ibsen continued. “Instead of calling for foreign fighters to come to Iraq and Syria to live in the caliphate, ISIS now calls on followers to carry out attacks in their home countries. ISIS wants to show the weakness of the modern state system and how these governments — and the Iraqi government specifically — cannot protect their people. ISIS is now melding the strategies of other Islamist groups, chiefly Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”
Indeed, concerns are growing in Iraq and Syria with regards to an ISIS resurgence — especially as the group, believed to still have several thousand soldiers in its rank and file, has capitalized on the distraction and economic hardship brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. Iraq-based intelligence sources also told Fox News that weapons caches belonging to ISIS operatives are found on a regular basis and that the group has managed to cower in place in underground tunnels that were for years safe havens in enabling fighters to evade detection.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
On Tuesday, Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) — the mission name issued by the U.S-led coalition to defeat ISIS in the region — confirmed in its monthly report that in the month of April, the task force had conducted seven strikes consisting of 16 engagements in Iraq and Syria.
“Taking out Quraishi will not stop ISIS. Fighting that ideology is the only way to defeat ISIS. That said, removing the leaders of these groups does create short-term disruptions as they then focus on figuring out who to put in charge next,” Ibsen added. “With luck, there will be infighting and power struggles that will further divide the group and perhaps cause rifts between senior leaders arguing over the future direction of the organization. Further, eliminating the head of any group always causes a psychological impact. It shows vulnerability and doubts over the group’s immediate future.”
Wray reveals FBI ‘looking carefully’ at foreign interference in protests following George Floyd’s death
The FBI is “looking carefully” at the possibility that foreign actors are influencing the sometimes-violent nationwide protests in the wake of George Floyd’s in-custody death, FBI Director Christopher Wray exclusively told Fox News’ Bret Baier on Wednesday.
Wray also revealed that “the FBI has over 2,000 active investigations that trace back to the government in China,” marking “about a 1,300 percent increase in terms of economic espionage investigations with the Chinese nexus from about a decade ago.”
“We have certainly seen in the past a variety of foreign adversaries looking to amplify controversy in this country,” Wray said. “And they use state media. They use social media. Some of that is through propaganda, some of that’s through disinformation, some of that’s through just fake information. And we are looking carefully at the prospect of foreign influence or foreign interference in all of the protests and activities that have occurred over the last few weeks.”
Wray’s comments came amid a high-level push from the White House and Congress to end the destruction of statues and other monuments across the United States.
SUSAN RICE IMPLIES RUSSIANS COULD BE BEHIND VIOLENT PROTESTS
In May, former Obama administration national security adviser Susan Rice bizarrely suggested in a televised interview Sunday that the Russians could be behind the violent nationwide demonstrations, although she offered no evidence and admitted she’s “not reading the intelligence these days.”
President Trump on Wednesday vowed to protect statues as some activists are calling for the toppling of monuments to former presidents, controversial historical figures and even Jesus Christ — after initially just targeting those of Confederate figures. Trump, who earlier in the day promised to sign an executive order by the end of the week to protect public statues and federal monuments, said that any continuation of the toppling of monuments “is not going to happen.”
And, Indiana GOP Rep. Jim Banks said will be introducing legislation that would make desecrating memorials to “previous U.S. presidents or a Founding Father” a federal offence punishable up to 10 years in prison. The “Defending America’s Culture and Heritage Act” (DAHCA), would amend the Veterans’ Memorial Preservation and Recognition Act of 2003 to “include statues of former U.S. presidents and all those individuals who signed the Declaration of Independence.”
“Look, equal justice is essential, but violence and destruction of federal property is not the way to get there,” Wray said. “And if there are appropriate bases for federal investigations, we’ll pursue them.”
China, Wray told Baier, is clearly engaged in a wide relay of malign activities — including “pursuing a campaign of intellectual property theft economic espionage, cyber-intrusions that target businesses — big and small — all across the country and our academic research institutions.”
OBAMA VA HOSPITALS USED ‘KUNG FLU’ IN MARKETING MATERIALS
The country’s communist leaders employ “what we sometimes call non-traditional collectors which can be businessmen, high-level scientists, high-level academics – people like that.”
China additionally “have an interest in influencing our political thought – our policies – to try and shift them in a more friendly, pro-China, pro-Chinese Communist party direction; and so sometimes that gets wrapped up in election issues,” Wray added.

With the White House and the Washington Monument in the background, a National Park Service worker cleans a statue of President Andrew Jackson, Thursday, June 11, 2020, near the White House in Washington, after protests over the death of George Floyd, a black man who was in police custody in Minneapolis. Floyd died after being restrained by Minneapolis police officers. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
As Wray spoke to Baier, a federal appeals court ordered the case against former Trump administration national security advisor Michael Flynn dismissed, despite a judge’s unilateral efforts to keep the case alive.
The DOJ had sought to drop the case after explosive internal FBI documents unsealed in April showed that top bureau officials discussed their motivations for interviewing Flynn in the White House in January 2017 — and openly questioned if their “goal” was “to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired.”
The handwritten notes — written by the FBI’s former head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap — further suggested that agents planned in the alternative to get Flynn “to admit to breaking the Logan Act” when he spoke to then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period.
APPEALS COURT TOSSES FLYNN CASE ; NEW STRZOK NOTES SURFACE
The Logan Act is an obscure statute that has never been used in a criminal prosecution; enacted in 1799 in an era before telephones, it was intended to prevent individuals from falsely claiming to represent the United States government abroad.
On Wednesday, Flynn’s lawyers said newly uncovered notes from former FBI official Peter Strzok indicate that then-Vice President Joe Biden was involved in the decision to pursue the Logan Act case against Flynn.
The notes state: “VP: ‘Logan Act,’ P: These are unusual times. VP: I’ve been on intel committee for ten years and I never. P: Make sure you look over things and have the right people on it. P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling the transition team? D: Flynn-> Kislyak calls but appear legit.” (The transcription assumes that in Strzok’s shorthand, “D” represents Director Comey, “VP” represents Vice President Biden, and “P” represents President Obama.)
Pressed by Baier as to why all these exculpatory notes took so long to come out, Wray acknowledged the legitimacy of the concerns.
“Decisions about producing documents in a criminal prosecution are typically handled by the prosecutors,” Wray said. “I will say that, of course, the Flynn investigation, which took place before I started and then by the time I started was in the hands of the Special Counsel’s Office, is something that has, in my view, raised serious concerns and questions. Which is why I ordered an after-action review by our inspection division, to take a look at whether or not the FBI’s policies and procedures need to be changed and if there are any current employees left who may bear any responsibility for this conduct.”
Wray added that the agency is fully cooperating with U.S. Attorney John Durham’s probe into surveillance abuses against Trump officials.
“We’ve cooperated fully with the Durham investigation,” Wray said. “In fact, we even have — a lot of people don’t know this, we actually have agents assigned working on the Durham investigation. So we’re very much lashed up with that.”
At the same time, Wray told Baier he has never once met with Trump one-on-one. Comey’s one-on-one meetings with the president had attacted scrutiny, and allegations of impropriety by Comey.
Fox News’ Bret Baier contributed to this report.
DNC opts for virtual convention
The Democratic National Committee announced Wednesday the party’s national convention will be scaled back into a virtual event for national delegates, putting the party in stark contrast with President Trump’s push to hold a larger-scale convention amid the coronavirus.
Party leaders and the convention committee said they are committed to giving delegates from across the nation a convention-like experience when former Vice President Joseph R. Biden is officially coronated as the party’s standard-bearer.
“Leadership means being able to adapt to any situation,” said DNC Chair Tom Perez. “That’s exactly what we’ve done with our convention.”
“Unlike this president, Joe Biden and Democrats are committed to protecting the health and safety of the American people,” Mr. Perez said. “Donald Trump’s days in the Oval Office are numbered.”
The announcement was broadly anticipated and means that delegates to the national convention will cast their votes remotely.
The Biden campaign said it supported the decision and that he will still be in Milwaukee to accept the nomination.
“The city of Milwaukee has been an incredible partner and we are committed to highlighting Wisconsin as a key battleground state at our convention this August,” said Biden Campaign Manager Jen O’Malley Dillon. “This will be a convention for all Americans who wish to join our mission to win the battle for the soul of this nation and build a fairer, more united country for us all.”
The convention is scheduled for August 17-20.
Donald Trump rejects monument destruction, pins ‘mob rule’ on Democrats
President Trump and Republican allies are seizing on the defense of monuments and statues as a campaign strategy aimed at portraying Democrats as tolerating “mob rule,” even hoping that the issue of lawlessness and crime in cities across the U.S. will serve as a wedge between Black voters and the Democratic Party.
Speaking about the movement to pull down statues of historical figures in numerous cities, including Washington, the president on Wednesday vowed, “It’s not going to happen, not as long as I’m here.”
He added. “As far as Democrats are concerned, I think they could care less whether or not it happens.”
Republican attorney general candidates nationwide are joining the president in a campaign chorus demanding that Democratic governors and mayors restore law and order after the looting, destruction and violent protests over racial justice and police brutality.
In Washington, a showdown was looming between the administration and protesters who were vowing to tear down a statue near the Capitol of Lincoln emancipating slaves.
Republican operatives say the strategy favors the president in his battle with presumed Democratic nominee Joseph R. Biden after turbulent months with COVID-19 and economic shutdowns.
“The longer this goes on, the better off Trump is in terms of his campaign prospects,” said Republican strategist Ford O’Connell. “People won’t stomach property destruction, defacing property and arson for a long period of time.”
He said drawing a red line on monuments “could be a really powerful issue” for Mr. Trump in the critical battlegrounds of Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, where the president is scheduled to visit Thursday.
“Who does he need to recapture? They are seniors, white working-class voters and conservative minorities,” Mr. O’Connell said. “These are not the people screaming that statues should be torn down.”
The president is preparing to issue an executive order this week on protecting monuments on federal property from “vandals and hoodlums,” as he calls them. Mr. Trump has warned that perpetrators will face harsh penalties, with prison terms of up to 10 years.
Administration officials said Wednesday that they activated 400 unarmed National Guard troops in Washington to protect federal monuments from vandalism. The troops could be used to support Park Service police “at key monuments to prevent any defacing or destruction,” the Pentagon said.
Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said he requested the National Guard troops and other resources.
“We will protect these places with dispatch and severity!” he tweeted.
Mr. Biden has disavowed the movement on the left to defund police departments. Now the Trump campaign is trying to link him to those who are destroying historical monuments.
“Around the country, lawless, left-wing radicals are targeting, destroying and defacing statues and monuments to American icons like Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson,” the Trump campaign said Wednesday. “Meanwhile, Joe Biden is hiding from questions and refusing to condemn this lawlessness.”
The Biden campaign had no immediate comment.
In recent days, the president has expanded his focus from liberals’ attempts to defund police departments to include their destruction of monuments and statues. Mr. Trump said Wednesday that the FBI is “investigating hundreds of people throughout the country for what they’ve done to monuments, statues and even buildings.”
“We have very strong laws already on the books. We have a law that’s 10 years — that’s a long time to have fun one night,” the president said at a White House press conference. “I think many of the people that are knocking down these statues don’t even have any idea what the statue is, what it means, who it is. When they want to knock down Grant. Now they’re looking at Jesus Christ. They’re looking at George Washington, they’re looking at Abraham Lincoln. Thomas Jefferson.”
At Lincoln Park, a few blocks from the Capitol, protesters are threatening to pull down the Lincoln Emancipation Statue on Thursday. The statue has stood since 1876 on property maintained by the National Park Service.
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s nonvoting member of Congress, wants the statue moved to a museum. She said the statue, which depicts Lincoln standing next to a crouching freed slave, is “problematic.”
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, California Republican, spoke with Mr. Bernhardt on Wednesday. He said Mr. Trump “will not allow the Emancipation Memorial of President Lincoln to be destroyed by the left-wing mob.”
“Thank you to our law enforcement for protecting our national treasures,” Mr. McCarthy tweeted.
Mr. O’Connell said there was a “big turning point” politically in the leftist protests when vandals moved beyond attacking statues of Confederates to destroying memorials to figures such as Ulysses S. Grant and Christopher Columbus.
“It became clear that their problem wasn’t primarily the Confederacy, but America,” he said.
The president on Wednesday portrayed the destruction of monuments as part of the Democratic Party’s failure to address looters, rioters and violent demonstrators in major cities nationwide. He said Senate Democrats on Wednesday blocked a Republican bill on policing because “they want to weaken our police” with a measure revoking legal immunity for cops in the line of duty.
Of the 20 most dangerous cities in the U.S., the president said, “every one of them’s Democrat-run.” He pointed to Chicago and Seattle by name.
“These are cities within the United States, Democrat-run, radical-left-run,” Mr. Trump said. “The Democrats want to weaken very substantially our law enforcement and our police. There are some that want to defund and abolish our police, if you can believe that. We’re not letting that happen.”
Republicans believe the law-and-order appeal can be effective with some Black voters who are concerned about rioting and destruction in their cities. One Republican Party operative suggested that the Trump campaign or its allies should run ads calling into question Mr. Biden’s relationship with Black voters, such as his reference to Barack Obama as “articulate,” “bright” and “clean.”
“Remember, my goal is not necessarily to turn off people for me, but to depress turnout on the other side,” the operative said.
As Mr. Trump took a stand for statues and monuments, he received a boost Wednesday from an unexpected source: Polish President Andrzej Duda, who was visiting the White House. Mr. Duda praised the president for ensuring that a defaced monument to Polish hero Tadeusz Kosciuszko in Lafayette Square near the White House was restored before Mr. Duda’s visit.
Mr. Duda said it was “completely incomprehensible” to Poles and Polish Americans that the monument was “devastated.” He thanked Mr. Trump for having it “renewed” so quickly that he was able to honor the Polish national hero during his visit.
“That made it possible for me to lay flowers at that monument and pay tribute to the great soldier and a great commander,” he told Mr. Trump. “Thank you for that.”
Democratic Convention Moves to Smaller Venue, as Delegates Are Urged to Stay Away
Updated June 23, 2020
-
Biden vs. Trump
- Joe Biden has taken a commanding lead over President Trump in the 2020 race, according to a new national poll by The Times and Siena College.
-
Tuesday’s Elections
- Fears about the coronavirus reduced the number of polling places and led to a surge in absentee balloting that delayed the results, possibly for days.
-
Biden’s V.P. Search
- Here are 13 women who have been under consideration to be Joe Biden’s running mate, and why each might be chosen — and might not be.
-
Keep Up With Our Coverage
- Get an email recapping the day’s news
Trump will not follow New Jersey coronavirus quarantine order, ‘he’s not a civilian,’ White House says
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks about a Trump administration plan aimed at helping to prevent suicides by U.S. veterans and other Americans, in the East Room at the White House in Washington, June 17, 2020.
Tom Brenner | Reuters
The White House said Wednesday that President Donald Trump will not change his plan to travel to New Jersey this weekend despite a new order by the governor requiring visitors who have been in states with high numbers of coronavirus cases to quarantine for 14 days.
“The president of the United States is not a civilian,” said White House spokesman Judd Deere, when asked about Trump’s compliance with the quarantine order given his travel Tuesday to Arizona, which has seen a rise in the rate of its Covid-19 cases.
“Anyone who is in close proximity to him, including staff, guests, and press are tested for COVID-19 and confirmed to be negative,” Deere said in a statement.
“With regard to Arizona, the White House followed it’s COVID mitigation plan to ensure the President did not come into contact with anyone who was symptomatic or had not been tested,” the spokesman added.
“Anyone traveling in support of the president this weekend will be closely monitored for symptoms and tested for COVID and therefore pose little to no risk to the local populations.”
Trump is the commander in chief of the U.S. military, but he has never been a member of the military.
The president is expected to travel this weekend to his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. In past visits to the club, he has flown on Air Force One to airports in Newark and Morristown.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, along with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, on Wednesday announced that visitors from states with large numbers of coronavirus cases would be required to quarantine for two weeks, or face fines.
“This is the smart thing to do. We have taken our people … through hell and back,” Murphy told reporters during a conference call Wednesday.
A spokesman for Murphy declined to comment on the White House’s statement about Trump’s visit to the Garden State.
Cuomo during the same conference call with Murphy said: “We worked very hard to get the viral transmission rate down. We don’t want to see it go up because a lot of people come into this region and they can literally bring the infection with them.”
“Because what happens in New York happens in New Jersey and happens in Connecticut,” Cuomo said.
At least eight people who worked on the advance team for Trump’s rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, have tested positive for Covid-19, two of whom were Secret Service agents. Two of the other people who tested positive did so after working at the rally, in contrast to the other six, whose test results came before the event occurred.
— Additional reporting by CNBC’s Tucker Higgins.
‘The Five’ blasts Pelosi’s ‘divisive’ comments on GOP police reform bill
Senate Democrats block Republican’s police reform bill; ‘The Five’ weighs in. Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS Watch more Fox News Video: http:/…
Read More












