London Escorts sunderland escorts asyabahis.org dumanbet.live pinbahiscasino.com sekabet.net www.olabahisgir.com maltcasino.net faffbet-giris.com asyabahisgo1.com www.dumanbetyenigiris.com pinbahisgo1.com sekabet-giris2.com www.olabahisgo.com maltcasino-giris.com faffbet.net betforward1.org www.betforward.mobi 1xbet-adres.com 1xbet4iran.com romabet1.com www.yasbet2.net www.1xirani.com www.romabet.top www.3btforward1.com 1xbet https://1xbet-farsi4.com بهترین سایت شرط بندی betforward

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
Home Blog Page 43

McConnell: ‘Senate has more than sufficient time to process a nomination’ for Supreme Court

0
McConnell: ‘Senate has more than sufficient time to process a nomination’ for Supreme Court

Washington (CNN)Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday reiterated his vow to hold a vote on a Supreme Court nominee once one is named by President Donald Trump and argued there is ample tim…
Read More

Protests over Supreme Court vacancy target homes of top GOP lawmakers

0
Protests over Supreme Court vacancy target homes of top GOP lawmakers

Angry protesters have gathered outside homes owned by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to express their anger at the Republican senators’ support for moving forward with nominating and confirming a new Supreme Court justice before November’s election after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Banging drums, shouting slogans and flashing lights, dozens of protesters amassed outside Graham’s home in Washington in the early morning hours Monday as Capitol Police tried to keep them off the lawmaker’s property.

“We can’t sleep so neither should Lindsey,” a banner read.

Graham was not in Washington at the time and that the senator “regrets the disturbance caused to his neighbors,” a spokesman for Graham said Monday afternoon.

GRAHAM: DEMS TELLING ME HOW TO HANDLE SCOTUS PICKS IS LIKE ‘ARSONISTS ADVISING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT’

But Graham later tweeted on Monday afternoon a comment asking his followers “how did your Monday start?” before asking them to “[s]tand with me against the mob.”

Demonstrators later marched from Graham’s home to the Supreme Court building.

A protester stands outside the house of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in Louisville, Ky., Saturday, Sept. 19, 2020. McConnell vowed on Friday night, hours after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to call a vote for whomever President Donald Trump nominated as her replacement. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

A protester stands outside the house of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in Louisville, Ky., Saturday, Sept. 19, 2020. McConnell vowed on Friday night, hours after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to call a vote for whomever President Donald Trump nominated as her replacement. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley)

Graham’s critics have pointed to his words after Senate Republicans refused to move forward on the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland during the last year of former President Obama’s second term. The South Carolina Republican said that if a vacancy arose during the last year of President Trump’s term and the primary process had already started, the seat should not be filled during that year.

Graham now says that he is “dead set on confirming” Trump’s pick, whoever it may be. He has explained his change of heart by pointing to Democrats’ behavior during Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation process when multiple women came forth with allegations of sexual misconduct during his high school and college years. Kavanaugh had previously been investigated by the FBI for past judicial appointments without incident.

Graham, whose committee will have to vote on any nomination before it goes to the full Senate, has also pointed to how it was Democrats who first changed Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for federal circuit court confirmations.

LEADERS FROM BOTH PARTIES UNDER FIRE FOR PREVIOUS STATEMENTS ABOUT SCOTUS NOMINATIONS

A similar scene to the one at Graham’s Washington residence played out on Saturday outside McConnell’s home in Kentucky as around 100 people gathered to protest.

“Ruth Sent Us,” and “No Ethics No Shame,” read some of the signs carried by crowd members in Louisville, local FOX station WDRB-TV reported.

“Hey-hey, ho-ho, Mitch McConnell has got to go,” others chanted.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

One protester was arrested on charges of disorderly conduct and improper parking after police determined she used a pharmacy parking lot without planning to patronize the store, the Courier-Journal of Louisville reported.

As Senate leader, McConnell would determine when or if a vote on a nomination would be held. Democrats and some Republicans have argued that any vote on a Trump court pick should be delayed until after the Nov. 3 presidential election.

But McConnell has faced criticism for his 2016 decision to deny Garland a chance for a Senate vote in 2016.

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer and Dom Calicchio contributed to this report.

Read More

EWTN News poll shows Catholic disapprove of Trump

0
EWTN News poll shows Catholic disapprove of Trump

Democratic presidential nominee Joseph R. Biden leads President Trump by 12 points with Catholics, according to an EWTN News/RealClear Opinion Research poll published Monday.

The new poll from a Catholic television network finds a slim majority of the faithful support Democrats in Congress and disapprove of President Trump.

According the poll released on Monday evening, 56% of Catholic respondents disapproved of Mr. Trump’s job as president. Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress — led by Roman Catholic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — received a 53% approval rating.

The polling, which interviewed 1,500 U.S. Catholic registered voters at the end of August, days after the Republican National Convention, comes during a national conversation across the faith over the role church doctrine — particularly on abortion — should guide voting decisions.

On a press call, Executive Editor of EWTN Matthew Brunson noted that support for the Republican president grows when “correlating frequency of mass attendance.” Mr. Trump has courted pro-life groups with conservative court nominees.

More than nine out of 10 Catholic voters, 91%, said they are concerned about the economy. Healthcare and the coronavirus also came in as top issues, with 73% of Catholics saying the pandemic was a major concern.

The voting bloc also raised concerns about the anti-Catholic and anti-religious rioting, with 83% concerned about the vandalism and attacks against churches.

The poll was conducted Aug. 27 through Sept. 1 with 1,212 registered Catholic voters, prior to the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The margin of error was plus or minus 3.01%.

A Pew Research Center poll released last month found Catholic voters evenly split, with 50% favoring Mr. Trump and 49% behind Mr. Biden. The center also showed that Mr. Trump carried the Catholic vote in 2016 by 52% to 44%, although other surveys have said the contest was much closer.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

Trump vetting ‘five women’ for Supreme Court

0
Trump vetting ‘five women’ for Supreme Court

President Trump said Monday he is vetting five women for the vacancy on the Supreme Court and confirmed he will make his selection by the weekend.

“Five women are being vetted very carefully,” he told White House reporters as he departed for an Ohio trip.

The pick will be announced “probably Saturday, but Friday or Saturday.”

He repeated his belief the Senate should act before Election Day.

“I’d much rather have a vote before the election, because there’s a lot of work to be done and I’d much rather have it,” Mr. Trump said. “There’s a great deal of time before the election. That’ll be up to Mitch in the Senate. I think it sends a good signal. It’s solidarity and lots of other things. I’m just doing my constitutional obligation. I have an obligation to do this. So I would rather see it before the election.”

Mr. Trump also warned Senate Republicans not to get cold feet about confirming a justice so close to Nov. 3, when voters will have their say.

“I think their voters, the people that voted for them, put them there because of a certain ideology or a certain feel, and they don’t want to have somebody do that. I think it’s very bad if they do that,” Mr. Trump said.

Two names that have been mentioned as top contenders for the vacancy are Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and Judge Barbara Lagoa of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Mr. Trump said he “may” visit Judge Lagoa on an upcoming trip to Miami.

“She has a lot of support,” the president said. “I don’t know her but I hear she’s outstanding.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

244 new COVID-19 cases confirmed in Massachusetts, 7 additional deaths

0
244 new COVID-19 cases confirmed in Massachusetts, 7 additional deaths

244 new COVID-19 cases confirmed in Massachusetts, 7 additional deaths

Daily positive test rate at 2.25%

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health reported an additional 244 confirmed cases of COVID-19 on Monday, bringing the statewide total to 125,723.There were 10,823 new molecular tests conducted, with a 2.25% daily positive rate. State health officials also confirmed seven new COVID-19-related deaths across Massachusetts, bringing the state’s confirmed coronavirus death toll to 9,107.About 3.43 million molecular tests for COVID-19 have now been administered in the state to more than 2.09 million individuals. Click here to see a graphical look at COVID-19 data.Latest town-by-town breakdown released by state As of Monday, 367 patients with the coronavirus were hospitalized in Massachusetts, an increase of three patients from what state health officials reported Sunday.Of those patients who are currently hospitalized, 69 were reported to be in an intensive care unit.In its weekly report, which was released last Wednesday, the DPH said 109,397 total patients have been released from isolation, meaning they are considered to have recovered from the coronavirus.PHNjcmlwdCBpZD0iaW5mb2dyYW1fMF85MTUyMTg3My03NmRhLTQ0ZmUtOTA0Ny1mMTllZWFlZGFjNmQiIHRpdGxlPSJDb3JvbmF2aXJ1cyBpbiBNYXNzYWNodXNldHRzIiBzcmM9Imh0dHBzOi8vZS5pbmZvZ3JhbS5jb20vanMvZGlzdC9lbWJlZC5qcz9yeXoiIHR5cGU9InRleHQvamF2YXNjcmlwdCI+PC9zY3JpcHQ+New data is published daily around 4 p.m. with the exception of Wednesday’s daily and weekly reports, which are published around 6 p.m.

BOSTON —

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health reported an additional 244 confirmed cases of COVID-19 on Monday, bringing the statewide total to 125,723.

There were 10,823 new molecular tests conducted, with a 2.25% daily positive rate.

State health officials also confirmed seven new COVID-19-related deaths across Massachusetts, bringing the state’s confirmed coronavirus death toll to 9,107.

About 3.43 million molecular tests for COVID-19 have now been administered in the state to more than 2.09 million individuals.

As of Monday, 367 patients with the coronavirus were hospitalized in Massachusetts, an increase of three patients from what state health officials reported Sunday.

Of those patients who are currently hospitalized, 69 were reported to be in an intensive care unit.

In its weekly report, which was released last Wednesday, the DPH said 109,397 total patients have been released from isolation, meaning they are considered to have recovered from the coronavirus.

New data is published daily around 4 p.m. with the exception of Wednesday’s daily and weekly reports, which are published around 6 p.m.

Read More

Signs of an ‘October vaccine surprise’ alarm scientists

0
Signs of an ‘October vaccine surprise’ alarm scientists

President Donald Trump, who seems intent on announcing a Covid-19 vaccine before Election Day, could legally authorize a vaccine over the objections of experts, officials at the Food and Drug Administration and even vaccine manufacturers, who have pledged not to release any vaccine unless it’s proved safe and effective.

In podcasts, public forums, social media and medical journals, a growing number of prominent health leaders say they fear that Trump — who has repeatedly signaled his desire for the swift approval of a vaccine and his displeasure with perceived delays at the FDA — will take matters into his own hands, running roughshod over the usual regulatory process.

Full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

The worries intensified over the weekend, after Alex Azar, the administration’s secretary of Health and Human Services, asserted his agency’s rule-making authority over the FDA. The fear is that Trump’s pressure on the HHS could influence the speed of an authorization. HHS spokesperson Caitlin Oakley said Azar’s decision had no bearing on the vaccine approval process.

An intervention in the process would signal another injection of politics into a sensitive public health decision by the norm-breaking Trump administration. Trump has repeatedly contradicted the advice of senior scientists on Covid-19 while pushing controversial treatments for the disease.

Overruling the FDA’s scientific judgment could lead to the rushed release of a vaccine of limited efficacy and, worse, unknown side effects.

Vaccines are typically approved by the FDA. But Azar — who reports directly to Trump — can issue an emergency use authorization, even before any vaccines have been shown to be safe and effective in late-stage clinical trials.

“Yes, this scenario is certainly possible legally and politically,” said Dr. Jerry Avorn, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, who outlined such an event in the New England Journal of Medicine. He said it “seems frighteningly more plausible each day.”

Vaccine experts and public health officials are particularly vexed by the possibility because it could ruin the fragile public confidence in a Covid-19 vaccine. It might put scientific authorities in the position of urging people not to be vaccinated after years of coaxing hesitant parents to ignore baseless fears.

Physicians might refuse to administer a vaccine approved with inadequate data, said Dr. Preeti Malani, chief health officer and professor of medicine at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, in a recent webinar. “You could have a safe, effective vaccine that no one wants to take.” A recent KFF poll found that 54 percent of Americans would not submit to a Covid-19 vaccine authorized before Election Day.

After this story was published Monday, an HHS official said that Azar “will defer completely to the FDA” as the agency weighs whether to approve a vaccine produced through the government’s Operation Warp Speed effort.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

“The idea the Secretary would approve or authorize a vaccine over the FDA’s objections is preposterous and betrays ignorance of the transparent process that we’re following for the development of the OWS vaccines,” HHS chief of staff Brian Harrison wrote in an email.

White House spokesperson Judd Deere dismissed the scientists’ concerns, saying Trump cared only about the public’s safety and health. “This false narrative that the media and Democrats have created that politics is influencing approvals is not only false but is a danger to the American public,” he said.

Usually, the FDA approves vaccines only after companies submit years of data proving that a vaccine is safe and effective. But a 2004 law allows the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization with much less evidence, as long as the vaccine “may be effective” and its “known and potential benefits” outweigh its “known and potential risks.”

Many scientists doubt a vaccine could meet those criteria before the election. But the terms might be legally vague enough to allow the administration to take such steps.

Moncef Slaoui, chief scientific adviser to Operation Warp Speed, the government program aiming to more quickly develop Covid-19 vaccines, said it’s “extremely unlikely” that vaccine trial results will be ready before the end of October.

Trump, however, has insisted repeatedly that a vaccine to fight the pandemic that has claimed, according to NBC News, more than 200,000 lives in the U.S., will be distributed starting next month. He reiterated that claim Saturday at a campaign rally in Fayetteville, N.C.

The vaccine will be ready “in a matter of weeks,” he said. “We will end the pandemic from China.”

Although pharmaceutical companies have launched three clinical trials in the United States, no one can say with certainty when those trials will have enough data to determine whether the vaccines are safe and effective.

  • Officials at Moderna, whose vaccine is being tested in 30,000 volunteers, have said their studies could produce a result by the end of the year, although the final analysis could take place next spring.
  • Pfizer executives, who have expanded their clinical trial to 44,000 participants, boast that they could know their vaccine works by the end of October.
  • AstraZeneca’s U.S. vaccine trial, which was scheduled to enroll 30,000 volunteers, is on hold pending an investigation of a possible vaccine-related illness.

Scientists have warned for months that the Trump administration could try to win the election with an “October surprise,” authorizing a vaccine that hasn’t been fully tested. “I don’t think people are crazy to be thinking about all of this,” said William Schultz, a partner in a Washington, D.C., law firm who served as a former FDA commissioner for policy and as general counsel for HHS.

“You’ve got a president saying you’ll have an approval in October. Everybody’s wondering how that could happen.”

In an opinion piece published in The Wall Street Journal, conservative former FDA commissioners Scott Gottlieb and Mark McClellan argued that presidential intrusion was unlikely because the FDA’s “thorough and transparent process doesn’t lend itself to meddling. Any deviation would quickly be apparent.”

But the administration has demonstrated a willingness to bend the agency to its will. The FDA has been criticized for issuing emergency authorizations for two Covid-19 treatments that were boosted by the president but lacked strong evidence to support them: hydroxychloroquine and convalescent plasma.

Azar has sidelined the FDA in other ways, such as by blocking the agency from regulating lab-developed tests, including tests for the novel coronavirus.

Although FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn told the Financial Times he would be willing to approve emergency use of a vaccine before large-scale studies conclude, agency officials also have pledged to ensure the safety of any Covid-19 vaccines.

Download the NBC News app for full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

A senior FDA official who oversees vaccine approvals, Dr. Peter Marks, has said he will quit if his agency rubber-stamps an unproven Covid-19 vaccine.

“I think there would be an outcry from the public health community second to none, which is my worst nightmare — my worst nightmare — because we will so confuse the public,” said Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, in his weekly podcast.

Still, “even if a company did not want it to be done, even if the FDA did not want it to be done, he could still do that,” said Osterholm, in his podcast. “I hope that we’d never see that happen, but we have to entertain that’s a possibility.”

In the New England Journal editorial, Avorn and co-author Dr. Aaron Kesselheim wondered whether Trump might invoke the 1950 Defense Production Act to force reluctant drug companies to manufacture their vaccines.

But Trump would have to sue a company to enforce the Defense Production Act, and the company would have a strong case in refusing, said Lawrence Gostin, director of Georgetown’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law.

Also, he noted that Trump could not invoke the Defense Production Act unless a vaccine were “scientifically justified and approved by the FDA.”

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Follow NBC HEALTH on Twitter & Facebook.

Read More

Conservative group launches website to battle big tech companies over online censorship

0
Conservative group launches website to battle big tech companies over online censorship

The Media Research Center has launched CensorTrack, a website dedicated to #FreeSpeechAmerica, a campaign designed to fight online censorship of conservatives.

“Our position is that if they can do it to the president of the United States, they can do it to anyone, and in fact that is exactly what is happening… every platform in Silicon Valley today is censoring conservatives,” MRC founder and president Brent Bozell told attendees of a virtual launch event on Sept. 17.

WHAT IS SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT, AND WHY IS IT UNDER FIRE?

The Media Research Center has launched CensorTrack, a website dedicated to #FreeSpeechAmerica, a campaign designed to fight online censorship of conservatives.

The Media Research Center has launched CensorTrack, a website dedicated to #FreeSpeechAmerica, a campaign designed to fight online censorship of conservatives.

“We’re going to be coordinating our effort with those on Capitol Hill, trying to work in a bipartisan manner to take our concerns,” Bozell added.

MRC vice president Dan Gainor said CensorTrack.org is the “first initiative of Free Speech America” and will feature analysis of tech companies, a look at fact-checkers, an examination of specific censorship issues, a breakdown of politicians, pundits and media figures who help the tech industry censor conservatives, and potential remedies.

“We’ve gone back to the basics and are working actively, proving the problem. We’ve done that by creating an archive of incidents of bias, as well as a resource for people interested in the issue or writing about it,” Gainor said.

“What we are seeing in the tech world right now is the greatest danger and encroachment to freedom of expression and thought, I think, in the history of our country,” First Liberty Institute CEO Kelly Shackelford said. “Tech companies are now an information highway, common couriers. And they control this information, and they’re engaging in extensive censorship.”

NBC NEWS UNDER FIRE FOR APPARENTLY PUSHING GOOGLE TO REMOVE CONSERVATIVE SITES FROM AD PLATFORM

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., attended the virtual launch event, telling listeners that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) should not be used as “an opaque shield” by the tech industry.

Section 230 states that “no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

The section has been pivotal in the rise of today’s social media giants by allowing not only Internet service providers –­ but also Google, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and others –­ to be shielded from liability from content posted on their platforms by third parties, in most cases.

“Critics says Section 230 gives tech companies too much power over what is and is not allowed on their sites. Supporters – including a wide range of Internet companies, free-speech advocates and open-Internet proponents – say that without the law, online communication would be stifled and social media as we know it would cease to exist,” Washington Post’s Rachel Lerman wrote earlier this year.

Blackburn plans to take action, although Section 230 has many defenders in its current state, and President Trump’s attempts to alter how social media platforms are regulated have been met with resistance.

HAWLEY INTRODUCES BILL TARGETING BIG TECH COMPANIES OVER POLITICAL CENSORSHIP CONCERNS

“What we are doing with Section 230 reform is clarifying who can use it, when they use it, how they are going to use it, and what it can apply to. And we’re changing language, removing that otherwise objectionable language that has caused or allowed big tech to say, ‘Well we find this, that or the other objectionable,’” Blackburn said.

Bozell agreed, telling attendees that Section 230 needs to be addressed.

“We are going to be advancing the ideas of Section 230. We think it’s time for this to be addressed. These are not impartial platforms, these are publishers and they have to be taken into account,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox Business’ Evie Fordham contributed to this report. 

Read More

UK Covid-19 alert level moving to 4

0
UK Covid-19 alert level moving to 4

Diners in Soho, London

Image copyright
Getty Images

The UK’s coronavirus alert level is being upgraded from 3 to 4, meaning transmission is “high or rising exponentially”, its chief medical officers have said.

It comes after the government’s scientific adviser warned there could be 50,000 new coronavirus cases a day by mid-October without further action.

The prime minister will make a statement in the Commons on Tuesday.

On Monday, a further 4,368 daily cases were reported in the UK, up from 3,899.

A further 11 people have also died within 28 days of getting a positive test, although these figures tend to be lower over the weekend and on Mondays due to reporting delays.

In a statement confirming their recommendation, the chief medical officers for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland said cases were now “rising rapidly and probably exponentially in significant parts of all four nations”.

They urged people to follow government guidelines “to avoid significant excess deaths and exceptional pressure in the NHS” over the autumn and winter.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the move reflected “the significant shift in the current threat posed by coronavirus”.

“This country now faces a tipping point in its response and it is vital everybody plays their part now to stop the spread of the virus and protect lives,” he said.

The alert level, which is recommended by the Joint Biosecurity Centre, was reduced from level 4 to 3 on 19 June – which indicated the virus was “in general circulation” but there could be a “gradual relaxation of restrictions”.

The proposed upgrading comes as the PM prepares to chair a Cobra emergency meeting on Tuesday morning – which will be attended by the leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Amid data showing London was “catching up” with Covid-19 hotspots in northern England, the capital’s Mayor Sadiq Khan said he “expects” to be invited to the meeting.

Speaking at Downing Street earlier, alongside chief medical adviser, Prof Chris Whitty, Sir Patrick Vallance said: “At the moment we think the epidemic is doubling roughly every seven days.

“If, and that’s quite a big if, but if that continues unabated, and this grows, doubling every seven days… if that continued you would end up with something like 50,000 cases in the middle of October per day.

“Fifty-thousand cases per day would be expected to lead a month later, so the middle of November say, to 200-plus deaths per day.

“The challenge, therefore, is to make sure the doubling time does not stay at seven days.

“That requires speed, it requires action and it requires enough in order to be able to bring that down.”

The move to level 4 should not come as a surprise given the warning from the UK’s two most senior pandemic advisers this morning.

Infections are rising – although some experts question whether the situation is as dire as Prof Chris Witty and Sir Patrick Vallance set out when they raised the prospect of 50,000 cases a day by mid-October.

Cases were always expected to increase at this time of year when respiratory viruses tend to circulate more coupled with the continued re-opening of society.

Certainly the trajectory of countries like France and Spain is not as sharp as the worst-case scenario put forward.

But it is clear the government wants to act early this time – one of the big criticisms is that they were slow to introduce lockdown in March, which resulted in more deaths.

Level 4 paves the way for extra restrictions to be introduced with an announcement expected on Tuesday.

Officials are very aware a fine balance needs to be navigated, which is why a full lockdown is not on the cards.

Schools will certainly be protected.

But any restrictions have a cost to society. Go too far and the risk is the cure becomes worse than the disease.

Prof Whitty and Sir Patrick also said:

  • The rising case numbers cannot be blamed on an increase in testing as there is also an “increase in positivity of the tests done”
  • Around 70,000 people in the UK are estimated to currently have the disease – and about 6,000 per day are catching it (based on an ONS study)
  • Less than 8% of the population has been infected to date, although the figure could be as high as 17% in London
  • Even though different parts of the UK were seeing cases rising at different rates, and some age groups were affected more than others, the evolving situation had to be seen as a problem for everyone without exception
  • Evidence from other countries showed infections were “not staying just in the younger age groups” but were “moving up the age bands”
  • The rising transmission is a serious “six-month problem that we have to deal with collectively” – but science will eventually “ride to our rescue”
  • The virus is not milder now than in April, despite claims to the contrary
  • It is possible “that some vaccine could be available before the end of the year in small amounts for certain groups” but “the first half of next year” is much more likely

On Sunday, the prime minister held a meeting in Downing Street with Prof Whitty, Chancellor Rishi Sunak and Health Secretary Matt Hancock to discuss possible further measures for England, ahead of an expected announcement on Tuesday.

BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said there were likely to be new restrictions on the hospitality sector, with pubs and restaurants possibly told to close for two weeks.

However, she said there was a “vigorous debate” inside government and forcing venues to have an earlier closing time was another possibility.

Labour has urged the government to avoid a second national lockdown, saying this would cause “unimaginable damage” to the economy and people’s wellbeing.

It is not a question of “if”.

Downing Street will have to introduce extra restrictions to try to slow down the dramatic resurgence of coronavirus.

You would only have to have dipped into a minute or two of the sober briefing from the government’s most senior doctor and scientist on Monday morning to see why.

What is not yet settled however, is exactly what, exactly when, and indeed, exactly where these restrictions will be.

Here’s what it is important to know:

The government is not considering a new lockdown across the country right now.

The prime minister is not about to tell everyone to stay at home as he did from the Downing Street desk in March.

Ministers have no intention at all to close schools again.

Nor, right now, are they planning to tell every business, other than the non-essential, to close again.

What is likely is some kind of extra limits on our huge hospitality sector.

Read more from Laura here.

Restrictions on households mixing indoors will be extended to all of Northern Ireland from 18:00 BST on Tuesday.

Areas in north-west England, West Yorkshire, the Midlands and four more counties in south Wales will also face further local restrictions from Tuesday.

And additional lockdown restrictions will “almost certainly” be put in place in Scotland in the next couple of days, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said.

“Hopefully this will be with four-nations alignment, but if necessary it will have to happen without that,” she said.

Welsh Health Minister Vaughan Gething added: “It may be the case that UK-wide measures will be taken but that will require all four governments to exercise our varying share of power and responsibility to do so.”

Prime Minister Boris Johnson spoke with leaders of the devolved administrations on Monday afternoon.

Meanwhile, the health secretary announced a new exemption to local restrictions in England for formal and informal childcare arrangements, covering those looking after children under the age of 14 or vulnerable adults.

Read More

Congressional Budget Office: Federal debt nears ‘unsustainable’ levels

0
Congressional Budget Office: Federal debt nears ‘unsustainable’ levels

Federal debt is nearing “unsustainable” levels, but low interest rates have created a window of opportunity for policy-makers to rein it in, the Congressional Budget Office said Monday, delivering a mixed outlook for the government’s long-term outlook.

Federal spending, currently 21% of gross domestic product, will rise to 31% by 2050, with most of that increase coming from interest payments on the rising debt, said Phillip J. Swagel, CBO’s director. Federal revenue, meanwhile, stood at just 16% of GDP last year, and will only reach 19% by 2050.

The gap between those spending and revenue numbers illustrates the problem.

“The fiscal path over the coming decades is unsustainable,” Mr. Swagel said in a stark statement describing CBO’s findings.

Federal debt held by the public will reach 98% of gross domestic product this year and will cross the 100% threshold next year.

It will reach a record 107% in 2023, and by 2050 — the end of CBO’s budget window — it will be a staggering 195% of GDP.

The coronavirus pandemic is a major cause of that, piling up debt this year and next, CBO said. But the problems run much deeper than virus spending.

Four of the government’s trust funds will be exhausted by 2031, including both Social Security funds, Medicare’s hospital insurance fund and the Highway Trust Fund.

Even treading water, much less making headway on the debt, will require significant sacrifices.

Mr. Swagel said it will mean sustained tax increases, spending cuts or a combination of the two, of nearly 3% of GDP a year.

If that began in 2025, it would add $2,200 that year to the average American’s tax bill or cost that much in lower federal spending.

Waiting longer to begin means even deeper spending cuts or tax hikes would be needed.

It’s not likely the economy can grow quickly enough to erase the need for spending cuts or tax increases, Mr. Swagel said.

Some economists have argued that the 100% debt mark is a clear danger sign for major world economies. CBO didn’t subscribe to that, but said there is some line out there.

“There is no set tipping point at which a fiscal crisis becomes likely or imminent, nor is there an identifiable point at which interest costs as a percentage of GDP become unsustainable. But as the debt grows, the risks become greater,” Mr. Swagel said.

Among the dangers are the more the government owes to foreign creditors, the less income the U.S. has. And the worse the budget picture, the less room the government has to maneuver in future fiscal crises, CBO said.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

T cell shortage linked to severe COVID-19 in elderly; antiseptic spray may limit virus spread

0
T cell shortage linked to severe COVID-19 in elderly; antiseptic spray may limit virus spread

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The following is a roundup of some of the latest scientific studies on the novel coronavirus and efforts to find treatments and vaccines for COVID-19, the illness caused by the virus.

A lower supply of a certain type of immune cell in older people that is critical to fighting foreign invaders may help explain their vulnerability to severe COVID-19, scientists say. When germs enter the body, the initial “innate” immune response generates inflammation not specifically targeted at the bacteria or virus.

Within days, the more precise “adaptive” immune response starts generating antibodies against the invader along with T cells that either assist in antibody production or seek out and attack infected cells.

In a small study published on Wednesday in Cell, COVID-19 patients with milder disease had better adaptive immune responses, and in particular, stronger T-cell responses to the coronavirus.

People over age 65 were much more likely to have poor T cell responses, and a poorly coordinated immune response in general, coauthor Shane Crotty of the La Jolla Institute for Immunology said in a news release.

As we age, our supply of “naive” T cells shrinks, he explained. Put another way, we have fewer “inexperienced” T cells available to be activated to respond to a new invader. “Ageing and scarcity of naive T cells may be linked risk factors for failure to generate a coordinated adaptive immune response, resulting in increased susceptibility to severe COVID-19,” the researchers said.

An antiseptic nasal spray containing povidone-iodine may help curb transmission of the new coronavirus, preliminary research suggests.

In test tube experiments, a team of ear, nose and throat doctors found that a povidone-iodine nasal spray inactivated the virus in as little as 15 seconds. The nasal spray they tested is typically used to disinfect the inside of the nose before surgery. Formulations designed for use on skin are not safe in the nose, the researchers note.

They reported on Thursday in JAMA Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery that they now have their patients use the spray before intranasal procedures, to reduce the risk of virus transmission through the air via droplets and aerosol spread.

They also suggest instructing patients to perform nasal decontamination before coming to appointments, to “further decrease intranasal viral load and … prevent spread in waiting areas and other common areas.” They caution, however, that routine use of povidone-iodine would not be safe for some people, including pregnant women and patients with thyroid conditions. Larger clinical trials have not yet proved that viral transmission is curbed by intranasal povidone-iodine solutions, but “these studies are already underway,” the researchers said.

Some COVID-19 antibody tests are much more reliable than others. But even with the best ones, reliability varies among patient subgroups, a new study suggests. Some tests look for IgM or IgA antibodies, the first antibodies produced by the immune system in response to an invader, which do not remain long in the body.

Other tests – the most common kind – look for IgG antibodies, which generally develop within seven to 10 days after symptoms begin and remain in the blood for some time after the patient recovers.

In a study posted on medRxiv on Wednesday in advance of peer review, researchers analyzed data from 11,809 individuals whose COVID-19 had been diagnosed with highly rated tests to see how well the various antibody assays would “recall” that the patient had been infected.

The most commonly used assays, which look for IgG, had a 91.2% recall rate. But the IgA and IgM assays had estimated recall rates of 20.6% and 27.3%, respectively, coauthor Natalie Sheils of UnitedHealth Group told Reuters. “Recall varies significantly across subpopulations and according to timing of the tests, with performance becoming relatively stable after day 14,” she said. “The tests performed better for men versus women, for non-whites versus whites and for individuals above age 45.” More research is needed to understand why these variations occur, Sheils added.

Click here for a Reuter’s graphic on vaccines and treatments in development.

(Reporting by Nancy Lapid; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

More stories you may be interested in

Read More