London Escorts sunderland escorts asyabahis.org dumanbet.live pinbahiscasino.com sekabet.net www.olabahisgir.com maltcasino.net faffbet-giris.com asyabahisgo1.com www.dumanbetyenigiris.com pinbahisgo1.com sekabet-giris2.com www.olabahisgo.com maltcasino-giris.com faffbet.net betforward1.org www.betforward.mobi 1xbet-adres.com 1xbet4iran.com romabet1.com www.yasbet2.net www.1xirani.com www.romabet.top www.3btforward1.com 1xbet https://1xbet-farsi4.com بهترین سایت شرط بندی betforward

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm

Global Statistics

All countries
695,781,740
Confirmed
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
627,110,498
Recovered
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
All countries
6,919,573
Deaths
Updated on September 26, 2023 9:06 pm
Home Blog Page 48

Mark Mix, ‘right to work’ crusader, supports unions

0
Mark Mix, ‘right  to work’ crusader, supports unions

Mark Mix, a tireless fighter for “right to work” laws that guarantee a person cannot be compelled to join a union or pay union dues, says he knows exactly whom he would like to speak for his cause: Samuel Gompers.

Gompers stands as a colossus in the history of America’s organized labor movement, yet Mr. Mix sees him as someone who understood the virtue of making union membership voluntary.

“‘I want to urge devotion to the fundamentals of human liberty — the principles of voluntarism,’” said Mr. Mix, quoting Gompers from the 1924 convention of the American Federation of Labor, which he founded. “‘No lasting gain has ever come from compulsion. If we seek to force, we but tear apart that which, united, is invincible.’

“Well,” Mr. Mix said admiringly, tossing the quote off from memory, “if we were hiring a spokesman, we’d hire Gompers.”

Few, if any, of the modern unions that have grown out of what Gompers and others constructed would hire Mr. Mix, or indeed have anything at all to do with the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation that he leads.

The foundation is not a law firm, per se, though it employs lawyers who work strictly pro bono for clients. If unions are known to be tough fighters, the foundation matches them. Attorneys are forbidden from settling cases on behalf of the foundation, only at the behest of the clients.

Boosted by the 2018 landmark Supreme Court decisions in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) that stopped mandatory dues payments for government workers, the right-to-work fight went from being mostly a distraction for Big Labor to a genuine movement.

“Oh, for the first 20 years we were on defense, definitely on defense all the time,” Mr. Mix recalled. “We were like a gnat flying around the AFL-CIO.”

But the notion that union membership or dues should not be compulsory has resonated with federal judges and everyday Americans, a majority of whom favor voluntary membership.

Gallup’s recent polling shows that 65% of American adults support labor unions, which is the highest level since 2003, though that does not reflect opposition to getting a choice about whether to join or pay dues.

The last time Gallup asked about right-to-work laws, in 2014, more than 70% of American voters supported that as well.

When Mr. Mix grew up, there wasn’t any question about whether he would take a pro-union line. His stepfather was a welder and a rock-ribbed member of the International Association of Merchants.

Mr. Mix, now 58, also idolized a teacher at his high school who was also the town mayor and a lifelong Democrat.

Consequently, Mr. Mix’s political life began as a Democrat and he would help raise funds for Democratic candidates. That solid liberal beginning deepened at Alfred University.

Through a series of events, Mr. Mix found himself at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia, among a motley house crew that included housemates he described as “a drug addict, a jock and a Confederate rebel.” He encountered the books by Ayn Rand and some new economic ideas in the classroom, “and everything started to look a little different,” he said.

He started with The National Right to Work Legal Foundation the day after Christmas 1986, spent his first years driving around the country passing or defending right to work laws in 14 states and has been at it ever since.

“It was incremental, the improvement, for a long time,” he said. “The unions would give up an employee now and then, but they didn’t want to lose a big case.”

Even today, Mr. Mix argues that the battle is misconstrued. It is not a question of unions or no unions, in his telling. Rather it is about unions with legally confiscated money or unions with freely given money.

“It has become a regressive, socialist movement,” he said of present-day unions. “You should not be able to force someone to pay you for the privilege of working. Organized labor is one of the most privileged private groups in America. There are some laws saying you have to pay them.”

Legal decisions have chipped away at that compulsory financing. Victories in Knox v. Service Employees International Union in 2012 and in Janus were rooted in years of work educating people much more than in changing judges, in Mr. Mix’s telling, as even the thinking of conservative figures such as Antonin Scalia evolved on the topic.

“We have always made the First Amendment argument, about the freedom of speech and association,” he said. “Scalia, for instance, was always a work in progress because his initial response would always be, ‘The legislature is the site of the original sin. You have to go to the legislature.’”

The same has been true for other Republican figures who might be assumed to be right-to-work supporters, such as former Govs. Mitch Daniels in Indiana and Scott Walker in Wisconsin.

They, too, first opposed right-to-work laws, but they came to favor them when persuaded that voluntary union membership and dues-paying had the backing of a majority of their constituents.

Mr. Mix and his allies are facing one of their biggest challenges in years. Democratic presidential nominee Joseph R. Biden has embraced the union’s fondest dream: a federal statute that would wipe out in a stroke all state right-to-work laws.

A Biden administration could mark a reversal of Big Labor’s ebbing clout. In 2017, union members represented 10.7% of the workforce, just half the 20.1% unionization rate of 1983, itself a significant decline from the one-third of the labor force in the 1950s.

Yet unions still represent an important money source for Democratic politicians. In the 2016 election cycle, groups and individuals associated with organized labor poured $217 million into races, and 90% of that total went to Democrats, as it has for at least the past two decades, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

In the current election cycle, campaign finance tracked by OpenSecrets shows 20 unions have poured more than $100 million into political campaigns. Nearly a quarter of that came from the two largest teachers unions: the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.

Most of that money is being spent in hopes of passing the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which a Biden administration would back. For now, it languishes in Congress after passing in the House on a party-line 224-194 vote in February.

Mr. Mix understands the fight remains joined but hopes recent history proves an ally. To buttress that hope, he has a memento suspended from his office ceiling.

It arrived in a UPS box on Dec. 17, 2012, and though it had no return address Mr. Mix knew who sent it. It settled a bet he had made with a pro-union friend.

“After Indiana had approved a right-to-work bill, I told him they were coming for Michigan next, and he said Michigan would pass a law like that when pigs fly,” Mr. Mix chuckled. “So now I have a pig flying in my office.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

Woman suspected of sending poisoned letter to Trump arrested

0
Woman suspected of sending poisoned letter to Trump arrested

(CNN)A woman suspected of sending a letter containing the poison ricin to President Donald Trump was arrested as she tried to enter the US from Canada at a border crossing in New York state, a US law…
Read More

Chicago postal workers threaten to stop delivering mail after multiple employees shot on the job

0
Chicago postal workers threaten to stop delivering mail after multiple employees shot on the job

United States Postal workers who deliver mail in some of Chicago’s more violent neighborhoods are threatening to halt their services after a mail carrier was shot in the city’s South Side earlier this month.

The carrier, a 24-year-old woman, was left critically and injured after being shot multiple times at 91st Street and Ellis Avenue while delivering mail on September 10. Police said the worker did not appear to be the target and had been caught in the crossfire during a drive-by.

FILE: Mail delivery vehicles are parked outside a post office in Boys Town, Neb. 

FILE: Mail delivery vehicles are parked outside a post office in Boys Town, Neb. 
(AP)

Chicago’s WSL-TV reported that she was the second mail carrier wounded by gunfire on that route. Another mail carrier, also caught in the middle of gunfire, was shot in March while on the job but survived.

A day after the second worker was shot, another USPS employee was hit with a paintball in Chicago’s South Side.

JUDGE BLOCKS POSTAL SERVICE CHANGES THAT SLOWED MAIL DELIVERY

Chicago postal workers rallied on Friday to demand that city officials address the threat to mail carriers’ safety, The Blaze reported. Mack Julion, president of the Chicago Chapter of the National Association of Letter Carriers, advised workers to stop delivering in areas where they feel unsafe.

“Any letter carrier who does not feel safe in any one of these communities then they are not to deliver mail and customers have to pick up their mail,” Julion said. “We are not going to have another situation where the letter carrier is shot down.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The 24-year-old shot while on the job earlier this month remains hospitalized. The Chicago Division of the U.S. Postal Service Inspection is offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the shooting suspect.

Read More

Mitch McConnell vow on Supreme Court nominee faces obstacles

0
Mitch McConnell vow on Supreme Court nominee faces obstacles

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made a bold commitment to a vote this year to confirm President Trump’s nominee to fill the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose death Friday has upended the elections.

The Kentucky Republican will have a tougher time fulfilling this commitment, though, than he did with his 2016 promise to block President Obama’s pick.

Two Republicans, Sens. Susan M. Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, have said they will oppose any effort to install a Trump nominee until they see who wins the presidential election.

With Republicans holding an effective 53-47 edge in the Senate, that leaves Mr. McConnell with room for only one more defection.

Justice Ginsburg, on her deathbed, dictated a statement to her granddaughter saying it was her “most fervent wish” that her seat not be filled until a new president is sworn into office in January. Democrats, including presidential nominee Joseph R. Biden, say Mr. Trump and the Republican-led Senate should honor that wish.

But Mr. Trump is moving quickly. He said a nominee will be named this week, and it will be a woman.

“We won. And we have an obligation, as the winners, to pick who we want,” the president said Saturday.

Within hours of the news of Justice Ginsburg’s passing, Mr. McConnell flatly stated that Mr. Trump’s nominee would get a vote.

It’s a reversal from 2016, when Mr. McConnell announced just hours after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia that the Senate would take no action on President Obama’s nominee. Over the ensuing months, the majority leader successfully blocked a confirmation vote for Judge Merrick Garland on grounds that the nominee shouldn’t be confirmed in an election year under the political alignments at the time.

Mr. McConnell has reasoned this time is different because Republicans hold the presidency and the majority in the Senate.

“Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary. Once again, we will keep our promise. President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate,” Mr. McConnell said in a statement Friday.

Democrats, who excoriated Mr. McConnell in 2016 and demanded a vote, now say he must live by that “election year” standard.

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, held a call with his conference over the weekend, and several media outlets reported that he told the colleagues “nothing is off the table” if Republicans move forward to fill Justice Ginsburg’s seat.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president,” Mr. Schumer posted on Twitter.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, New York Democrat, have suggested that Democrats would attempt to pack the court with more justices to balance out Mr. Trump’s nominees.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, refused Sunday to rule out another impeachment attempt, which could tie up the Senate’s schedule in the months remaining in this Congress.

“We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now,” Mrs. Pelosi said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Mr. Biden urged Senate Republicans to repeat their 2016 actions.

“Don’t vote to confirm anyone nominated under the circumstances President Trump and Senator McConnell have created,” he said. “Don’t go there.”

The confirmation battle is likely to become a major campaign issue. Election experts say Mr. Trump’s promise to appoint conservatives and his release of a list of potential names helped turn out Republican voters in 2016 who were not enthusiastic about him.

Mr. Trump appointed Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh. If he gets a third justice on the high court, it would be the most since President Reagan.

The Supreme Court battle is playing out in Senate races. Democratic challengers are demanding that Republican incumbents abide by the 2016 standard of not confirming a justice in an election year.

But Mr. McConnell has won commitments from some key Republicans.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, chairman of the Judiciary Committee and a senator who said in 2016 and 2018 that he would be bound by the Republicans’ precedent, now says he is on board with Mr. McConnell’s push.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, Tennessee Republican, said Sunday that he will back Mr. McConnell’s move as well.

“No one should be surprised that a Republican Senate majority would vote on a Republican president’s Supreme Court nomination, even during a presidential election year,” he said. “Sen. McConnell is only doing what Democrat leaders have said they would do if the shoe were on the other foot.”

A spokeswoman for Sen. Mitt Romney, Utah Republican, shot down a Twitter report saying the Utah Republican had privately committed to opposing a nominee until after the election.

“This is grossly false,” Liz Johnson said.

Sens. Joni Ernst of Iowa, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Martha McSally of Arizona, all facing tricky reelection bids, all announced they support Mr. Trump’s push to move quickly.

One wrinkle is that Ms. McSally was appointed to the seat of the late Sen. John McCain and isn’t entitled to the full Constitutional term through January. The Arizona Republic reported Friday that should she lose in November, her Democratic successor could be sworn in as soon as the results are certified, perhaps by Nov. 30.

That could constrain Republicans’ ability to operate in a lame-duck session.

With the current Senate lineup, if Ms. Collins and Ms. Murkowski join all 47 members of the Democratic caucus to oppose Mr. Trump’s effort to push a nominee before the inauguration, Republicans would have one more seat of leeway — and none if the McSally scenario in Arizona plays out.

Vice President Mike Pence would break a 50-50 tie.

Sen. Tom Cotton, Arkansas Republican, said he doesn’t rule out some help from Democrats.

“As Mitch McConnell has said, there will be a vote. And I don’t think that we should discount Democratic votes, either,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Mr. Cotton said there was a “referendum” on the issue of Supreme Court nominees in the 2018 midterms.

Four Democratic senators who voted against Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation lost reelection the next month.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

Updated CDC guidance acknowledges coronavirus can spread through the air

0
Updated CDC guidance acknowledges coronavirus can spread through the air

(CNN)The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated guidance on its website to say coronavirus can commonly spread “through respiratory droplets or small particles, such as those in aeroso…
Read More

Trump vows to pick woman for Supreme Court to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg

0
Trump vows to pick woman for Supreme Court to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The White House said Sunday that President Trump will nominate a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “very soon,” and the president promised to pick a woman as he quickly seized on the vacancy as an urgent issue to motivate his voters.

As Trump supporters take up the chant of “fill that seat,” Judge Amy Coney Barrett has emerged as the front-runner on the president’s short list of candidates, according to people familiar with the discussions. She is a conservative judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago; the president interviewed her for a seat on the high court in 2018.

Other serious contenders are Judge Barbara Lagoa of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, who is a Cuban American from Florida, and Judge Allison Jones Rushing of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. An announcement could be made as early as Monday or Tuesday.

“The president is prepared to make a nomination very soon,” Marc Short, chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence, said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “He’s narrowed his list. And he looks forward to making a nomination and fulfilling his obligation as president.”

Mr. Trump said, “It will be a woman — a very talented, very brilliant woman.”

The president’s swift movement to choose a replacement for the liberal Justice Ginsburg, who died Friday at age 87 after a long battle with cancer, underscored the stakes of the nomination.

The vacancy presents Mr. Trump with the opportunity to forge a solidly conservative majority on the court in just four years, after his appointments of Justices Neil M. Gorsuch in 2017 and Brett M. Kavanaugh in 2018.

It also gave Mr. Trump an opening to redefine the presidential election in a year dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, economic shutdowns, and the erosion of law and order.

“It does change the focus, without a doubt,” said White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Trailing Democratic nominee Joseph R. Biden in national polls, Mr. Trump moved quickly to emphasize what’s at stake with the Supreme Court and his “moral duty” to make a nomination as soon as possible.

Democrats and two Republican senators, Susan M. Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, are calling on Mr. Trump to wait until after the outcome of the presidential election to make a nomination. Two other Republicans would have to agree with them to prevent the 53-47 Republican majority from approving a Trump pick.

The president told thousands of supporters at a campaign rally in North Carolina on Saturday night that he has an obligation to act now.

“So Article 2 of our Constitution says the president shall nominate justices of the Supreme Court,” Mr. Trump told the crowd in Fayetteville. “I don’t think it can be any more clear. … I don’t think so.’”

“Fill that seat,” the crowd chanted.

“That’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to fill the seat,” Mr. Trump said to cheers. “Right now, we’re here and we have an obligation to the voters, all of the people, the millions of people, that put us here.”

In 2016, Mr. Trump won over many evangelical voters by releasing a list of conservative potential Supreme Court nominees from which he would choose if elected. He did so again two weeks ago and called on Mr. Biden to disclose his own list. Mr. Biden has not.

“The Supreme Court was a very central issue in both the 2016 presidential election and then the 2018 midterm elections where, by the way, I didn’t run,” Mr. Trump said. “The bad news for the Democrats is we are more enthusiastic now. We are getting crowds [even in] this pandemic.”

Supporters at the president’s campaign rally in North Carolina agreed that the nomination battle will motivate Mr. Trump’s base.

“It was God’s perfect timing in this election,” Paulette Fittshur, 59, a resident of Leland, North Carolina, told Reuters. “It’s a golden opportunity for conservatives.”

Democrats, too, say the vacancy is firing up their base. ActBlue, the online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates, reported raising a record $70.6 million Saturday after Justice Ginsburg’s death.

Pro-life activists are excited about the chance to put another conservative on the high court, especially because the next justice will replace a pro-choice jurist.

Judge Barrett, 48, a former law professor at the University of Notre Dame, clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia. She is a strict originalist who thinks a judge should “enforce her best understanding of the Constitution rather than a precedent she thinks is clearly in conflict with it,” she wrote in a 2013 Texas Law Review article.

“She’s very highly respected,” Mr. Trump said Saturday.

Judge Barrett and her husband, Jesse, have seven children. During her 2017 confirmation hearing to serve on the 7th Circuit, Judge Barrett tangled with the Senate Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat, Dianne Feinstein of California, over her Catholicism.

“The dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern when you come to big issues that people have fought for years in this country,” Mrs. Feinstein told Judge Barrett.

The judge replied, “It’s never appropriate for a judge to impose that judge’s personal convictions, whether they arise from faith or anywhere else, on the law.”

Judge Lagoa, 52, of the 11th Circuit, is the first Hispanic woman to serve on the Florida Supreme Court.

A first-generation Cuban American, she is said to have caught the president’s attention for several reasons: She is a conservative, is relatively young, hails from a battleground state with 29 electoral votes that Mr. Trump badly needs to win, and has an ethnicity that could bring more Hispanic women to his side.

“She’s an extraordinary person,” the president said. “I’ve heard at length about her. She’s Hispanic and highly respected — Miami. Highly respected.”

She is also a former assistant U.S. attorney. In 2000, she worked as a private attorney pro bono on a legal team that defended the Miami-based relatives of Elian Gonzalez, the Cuban boy in a high-profile custody dispute between his father in Cuba and his extended family in Miami.

In her speech accepting the Florida Supreme Court appointment in 2019, Judge Lagoa said she would not engage in judicial activism.

“It is the role of judges to apply, not to alter, the work of the people’s representatives,” she said.

The Senate confirmed her for the 11th Circuit seat last November by a lopsided vote of 80-15.

Judge Lagoa’s parents fled Fidel Castro’s Cuba in the mid-1960s. She referred to their experience when she was sworn in to Florida’s high court in May 2019.

“Many of those in this room are the children and grandchildren of individuals who fled from dictatorship,” she said at the time. “Through hard work, education, faith and a strong community, they succeeded. Because of the shared experiences of our parents and grandparents many of us in this room have a special appreciation for the rule of law. We understand what it means when individual liberties, respect for private property, and basic human rights are abandoned by a government. This is why the oath I just took is not just words on a piece of paper to me. Unlike the country my parents fled, we are a nation of laws and not of men.”

Judge Rushing, 38, is a favorite of evangelical groups. She clerked for Justice Gorsuch when he served on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Another candidate is Kate Todd, deputy assistant to the president and deputy counsel to the president. Despite the president’s pledge to pick a woman this time, he also has expressed interest in Judge Amul Thapar of Kentucky, who sits on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He is a favorite of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican.

⦁ David Sherfinski and Tom Howell Jr. contributed to this report.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

Fact check: Biden falsely claims Trump campaign only asked him for Supreme Court list after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died

0
Fact check: Biden falsely claims Trump campaign only asked him for Supreme Court list after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died

Washington (CNN)Former Vice President Joe Biden made false claims in a Sunday speech in which he urged Senate Republicans to let the winner of the presidential election fill the Supreme Court vacancy…
Read More

Herschel Walker reveals ‘truth’ about BLM, Trump: ‘I’m going to fight for’ America

0
Herschel Walker reveals ‘truth’ about BLM, Trump: ‘I’m going to fight for’ America

Black Lives Matter supporters should do their research on what exactly they’re promoting, former NFL player Herschel Walker told Fox News’ told “Sunday Morning Futures.”

Walker said he felt “so guilty” after hearing Black Lives Matter co-founders call themselves “trained Marxists” in an interview, and was compelled to tell the American people the truth. Both co-founders, Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza, have referred to themselves as such.

“I felt so guilty because I always consider myself a person to tell the truth,” he said. “And I said, I haven’t been telling the American people the truth because… I didn’t hear anyone ever tell me that [they were] a trained Marxist.”

HERSCHEL WALKER REACTS TO NFL’S SOCIAL JUSTICE DEMONSTRATIONS

“All you athletes out there, all you companies, all you professional teams that’s promoting BLM. Are you telling me that you’re promoting someone that said that they’re trained Marxists?” he asked.

The White House is visible behind a woman who holds her fist up as she poses for a photograph with a large banner that reads Black Lives Matter hanging on a security fence in Washington, after days of protests over the death of George Floyd. June 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

The White House is visible behind a woman who holds her fist up as she poses for a photograph with a large banner that reads Black Lives Matter hanging on a security fence in Washington, after days of protests over the death of George Floyd. June 8, 2020. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

Those who do support BLM and are aware of the implications of Marxism should be truthful with their fellow Americans, Walker argued. He pointed out that Marxists do not believe in American values such as religion.

HERSCHEL WALKER SLAMS BLM MOVEMENT, CHALLENGES NFL OWNERS AND PLAYERS WHO SUPPORT ‘TRAINED MARXISTS’

Walker said he spoke with President Trump to further spread American “truth” and debunk some of the falsehoods surrounding the president and his character.

“I’ve known him for 37 years,” he said. “The truth is he is not a racist. The truth is he loves the United States of America. I’m tired of people listening to his tweets saying that that’s the type of man he is because he’s not. Look at the action that he does.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I’m a guy who believes in the Lord Jesus. I believe in my family. And I love America,” he added. “So I’m going to fight for it. I’m going to do what I can to tell the people the truth.”

Fox News’ Frank Miles contributed to this report

Read More

Democrats threaten to impeach William Barr over John Durham Russia probe

0
Democrats threaten to impeach William Barr over John Durham Russia probe

Democrats are turning up the heat on William Barr, accusing the attorney general of trying to influence the November presidential election and threatening impeachment after he gave a fiery speech last week lambasting career federal prosecutors.

The chairs of four House committees urged the Justice Department’s internal watchdog to open an “emergency” investigation into whether Mr. Barr is using U.S. Attorney John Durham’s Russia probe as part of an effort to taint the presidential election.

In a letter Friday to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the four lawmakers said Mr. Barr’s comments and actions could be damaging “to public confidence in the integrity of the DOJ and our democratic process.”

“Attorney General Barr has signaled repeatedly that he is likely to allow DOJ to take prosecutorial actions, make public disclosures, and even issue reports before the presidential election in November,” the lawmakers wrote. “Such actions clearly appear intended to benefit President Trump politically.”

The letter arrived the same day Rep. Steve Cohen, Tennessee Democrat, authored a scathing op-ed calling for Mr. Barr’s impeachment and a day after Democratic senators pleaded for Mr. Horowitz to intervene.

A Justice Department spokeswoman and a spokeswoman for the inspector general’s office declined to comment.

Democrats were rankled by Mr. Barr’s speech marking Constitution Day last week at Hillsdale College, a school with conservative ties.

Mr. Barr accused his Justice Department prosecutors of acting as “headhunters.” He also compared them to preschoolers, decried them as part of the “permanent bureaucracy” and suggested they should be reined in by politically appointed leaders.

The next day, the Democrats launched a three-pronged assault on Mr. Barr. They targeted the Durham probe in particular.

The Durham probe has been digging into the origins of the Russia collusion probe since May 2019 and veered into a criminal investigation five months later. Democrats now worry that Mr. Durham’s team is cooking up an “October surprise” for the presidential race.

Mr. Barr’s political opponents say his public comments about the investigation could violate Justice Department policy if Mr. Durham releases a report or brings indictment within 60 days of Election Day.

Mr. Barr in 2018 authored a report saying politically charged prosecutorial and law enforcement actions must be avoided within 60 to 90 days of Election Day, but Democrats contend Mr. Barr has changed his mind. They cite an interview the attorney general had earlier this year with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt.

“You don’t indict candidates or perhaps someone that’s sufficiently close to a candidate, that it’s essentially the same, you know, within a certain number of days before an election. But you know, as I say, I don’t think any of the people whose actions are under review by Durham fall into that category,” he said in the interview.

Democrats fear Mr. Barr will try to skirt Justice Department rules by having Mr. Durham issue a report instead of filing criminal charges.

“With potentially devastating consequences for our democracy, Attorney General Barr appears to have changed his position and no longer supports the long-standing DOJ policy of refraining from taking overt actions or disclosures in the run-up to an election if there is a possibility the action could impact the election,” the Democrats wrote.

They also asked the inspector general to review Mr. Durham’s legal authority to issue a report about a subject who has not been charged in a federal court. That challenge is likely to fail given that special counsel Robert Mueller’s lengthy report touched on several subjects who had not been charged.

Also on Friday, Rep. Steve Cohen, Tennessee Democrat, called on Congress to launch an impeachment inquiry into Mr. Barr. Mr. Cohen said the attorney general is conducting a “politically motivated assault on the rule of law, the norms of procedural due process and our election systems.”

“That is why I have attempted to address these concerns by introducing H. Res 1032, calling for an inquiry into whether Barr should be impeached,” he wrote in the opinion piece published by The Hill. “Some people counsel patience, but I’m reminded of what wis

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Read More

Pine-Sol cleaner has been approved to kill coronavirus on hard surfaces

0
Pine-Sol cleaner has been approved to kill coronavirus on hard surfaces

(CNN)Pine-Sol’s original cleaner has been approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a product that can kill the coronavirus on frequently used surfaces.
The product was added to th…
Read More